I know this is really weird, but I think I'm essentially trying to describe Death as an entity that is to a temporal stream of events what a painting is to a film; both are complete entities, but are fundamentally different in how they deal with time. The painting is temporally static, whereas the film has a changeable moment - like life, it has a "present", past and future.

If I try to write about death in this way, is there a word to express that?

Infinite, unchanging, eternal and constant don't quite seem to work because they imply a passage of time around the subject. I'd considered "timeless", but I'm not entirely sure about it because I feel like it has too many connotations of "classic", or again, that it simply implies something unaffected by time rather than something alien to it.

I realise this is a bit of a longshot, but does anyone have any ideas? If there isn't a word for it, I'd even be up for suggestions for a new word, so long as it's meaning is recognisable.

  • 'Punctive' is defined: a punctive event happens at a point, or what can be considered a point, in time. It's usually used when discussing grammar (the synonym 'punctual' is also used, but has a far more common sense) and contrasts with 'durative'. Commented Oct 30, 2016 at 16:21
  • 1
    Death is a time span with a more or less well defined beginning, so it is not timeless at all. It is eternal (at least one sided infinite interval of time). Commented Oct 30, 2016 at 17:50
  • 4
    Guys, please stop posting answers in comments. It defeats the upvote/downvote system and makes it harder for visitors to find and compare answers. Commented Oct 30, 2016 at 18:21
  • 2
    I wish you'd give us an idea how you want to use the word, with an example sentence. Commented Oct 31, 2016 at 0:45
  • 1
    @EdwinAshworth, I get what you're saying, but suggesting an answer is not a request for clarification, but a suggested answer. It should be posted as an answer and OP can iterate through it in the comments section (of that answer). Commented Nov 8, 2016 at 1:15

7 Answers 7


The word atemporal means

independent of or unaffected by time.

(Merriam-Webster's definition)

  • Wizard, I think that's exactly what I'm looking for, thanks!
    – user203511
    Commented Oct 30, 2016 at 14:47
  • 3
    @user203511, if it fits your needs, don't forget to mark the answer with the green checkmark Commented Oct 30, 2016 at 18:25

"eternal" might be the word you're looking for.

  • unchanged by time, esp being true or valid for all time; immutable, eternal truths. TFD
  • 3
    "Infinite, unchanging, eternal and constant don't quite seem to work because they imply a passage of time around the subject."
    – Tuesday
    Commented Oct 30, 2016 at 20:32

I'm accustomed to using "stasis" for the concept but it makes no sense for a painting. But as for Death itself we don't use such words at all. "Final" is what tends to get used.

  • It seems like "static" is the best answer to this question. Commented Oct 21, 2017 at 22:49

It seems to me that you already mentioned the word you are looking for: "static", in the sense of "characterized by a lack of movement, animation, or progression". In the comparison you mentioned, the difference between the painting and a movie is about movement, which is a function of space and time.

  • This is more of a comment, if you reach 50 reputation you can comment on a question.
    – Helmar
    Commented Nov 1, 2016 at 13:24

Everlasting. I think it could give the idea of atemporal moment or circumstance. I really cannot think of another word giving the idea disconnected to time; there is a danger to fall into phyilosophical discourses and statements—things I could digress of for hours and hours, but now I do not feel like doing it. Example:

Duran Duran's song: "Ordinary World" is an everlasting piece of music.


I suggest the adjective "aorist", also the name of the timeless / unlimited tense of some old Indo-European languages.

from TheFreeDictionary 1. a verb tense, as in Classical Greek, expressing action, esp. in the past, without further implication as to completion, duration, or repetition.


2. of or in this tense.

[1575–85; < Greek aóristos unlimited]


Since you're willing to accept a new word so long as its meaning is recognizable, I'll offer one:


with the intended meaning of "existing outside of (ex-) a/any period of/point in time (chronous)."

Since it's a neologism (as best I can tell), I have no sources/references to cite for this one.

  • How are non-words going to help people looking here for guidance on acceptable English? Commented Nov 8, 2016 at 0:48
  • @Edwin From the OP's question: "If there isn't a word for it, I'd even be up for suggestions for a new word, so long as it's [sic] meaning is recognisable." The OP specifically stated that a new word is acceptable; I wouldn't have suggested it otherwise. And I think it ticks the box of "recognizable meaning" as I formed the word from two familiar Greek/Latin parts.
    – pyobum
    Commented Nov 8, 2016 at 0:52
  • But I'm with @no-hat on this issue: 'I really don't feel comfortable at all with our site becoming a place where people go who want a word invented. While I delight in exciting new words being invented and promulgated, I think we will rapidly lose our reputation as a place where people can get authoritative answers if many answers are not authoritative but just merely inventive. // I'd go further, in fact, and say that a 'word' only comes into existence when a candidate gains a reasonable currency. ELU deals with accepted English usage. Commented Nov 8, 2016 at 0:55
  • @Mitch has also stated (scare-quotes mine, as a neologism has recently been recognised as a word) << If a question is looking for a 'neologism' ... [it is] off-topic because it is not answerable [in accordance with ELU policy]. >> Commented Nov 8, 2016 at 1:02
  • @EdwinAshworth I suppose if we carry on with this, it should move to chat, since this is going beyond the scope of/relevance to this particular question. I partially agree. I'm generally not a fan of trying to make up words to fit an OP's question; however, if the OP specifically asks for a new word or states that one is acceptable, and a good one comes to mind, I see nothing wrong with suggesting one, especially if the answerer makes it clear it's not an "established" word. I suppose we've just got a difference of opinion on this. I do at least appreciate your explanation for the downvote.
    – pyobum
    Commented Nov 8, 2016 at 1:02

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.