Adjectiving below is not always well received.
As I’ve written before, it’s because the below whatever is nearly always better written the following whatever or quite simply this whatever. It sounds foreign otherwise; it is rarely if ever used by native speakers, as native Englander Barrie England observes.
Courtesy of Darshan Chaudhary in a before comment on the original post, a nice alternative is to instead use in the example given below. Because that now uses below as a traditional adverb, it sounds just fine.
Using Syntactic Tests for Adjectives
You’ll find that below makes for a highly suspect adjective, because attempting to use it as one would use other adjectives readily produces sentences that are ungrammatical. We can use syntactic tests employing substitution of below for normal adjectives to see that it is not of their category.
Here are a couple of easy demonstrations:
How many illustrative examples were you considering?
*How many below examples were you considering? [ungrammatical]
Please include a more illustrative example.
*Please include a more below example. [ungrammatical]
This big red firetruck shows its age.
*This big below firetruck shows its age. [ungrammatical]
*This below red firetruck shows its age. [ungrammatical]
Given that we cannot swap below in for other adjectives in the sentences shown above, it doesn’t really feel like much of an adjective at all. That’s why it feels odd to attempt to use it in places where only adjectives go in a noun phrase such as in the examples you provided.