I wonder about words like:

  • Beseech
  • Befallen
  • Beholder (?)
  • Bewitch
  • Befool
  • Befriend
  • Befog

and so on...

Those words have always caught my attention, and I find them somewhat more sophisticated.

My questions are (no need to answer all at once) :

  1. Is there a category for such words? For example, if I would be to search for words like 'greater', 'higher', 'more beautiful', I would find them under the comparatives category.
  2. Can 'be-' be used as a prefix in general? If so, how does it work?
  3. How is the usage of such words viewed but a native English speaker? E.g. Archaic, poetic, prosaic, convoluted, just ok... ? I ask it because I've seen them to be used more in literature.

1 Answer 1


I think you will be satisfied with Steve's quirky weblog post called Be-ing: The Bemusing, Busy Prefix be-. The use of this prefix is much more common than you think and does not apply to one particular category of words, to answer your first question.

Steve explains:

“Be-” as a prefix goes back to Old English, apparent in such ancient-sounding words as betwixt, betroth, and bereft.

We see it in so many common verbs we use everyday: begin, behave, become, believe, befriend, belong.

And in common prepositions and adjectives: beneath, beside, below, between, beyond, beloved, bereaved.

This prefix is strikingly versatile and productive. The same post explains:

The prefix be- can act as an intensifier, indicating something is thoroughly or excessively done, as in bewitch, bewilder, bedazzle. It can show a verb is affecting or causing something: bedevil, bedim, befoul. The prefix be- also expresses position: beside, below, between, beneath, behind. Or that something is covered all over or all around: bejeweled, bespattered, bewhiskered. And be- can indicate creation, beget, begin, become, or removal, the end of existence, as in begone, bereave (to take a loved one, especially in death), bereft (deprived of something) and, of course, behead. The multi-tasking prefix be- can turn an intransitive verb into a transitive one as in bemoan and belie. And be- can also turn nouns and adjectives into verbs: befriend, belittle, becalm.

Consequently, the use of be- is not archaic in itself. Each word will be archaic or not according to its own itinerary. However, forming new words with this prefix is outdated now, as Etymonline states:

The prefix was productive 16c.-17c.

The same site gives an interesting detail:

The Old English be- is the unstressed form of bi "by. The form has remained by- in stressed positions and in some more modern formations (bylaw, bygones, bystander).

  • 1
    There's also an old privative use, no longer productive: behead, belimb, beland.
    – tchrist
    Commented Jan 16, 2023 at 14:29

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.