It is acceptable to use "responsible" as a noun?

For example, "He urged the responsibles to take action" (the responsible people/employees)

The dictionaries I consulted don't list responsible as noun but I occsionally see it used this way. It's also convenient when space is limited. But maybe it is confusing to some people.

closed as off-topic by FumbleFingers, curiousdannii, jimm101, Chenmunka, Helmar Oct 19 '16 at 12:36

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • It's quite common for adjectives to be used as nouns, which is probably why dictionaries don't mention it at every adjective. The same holds for participles of verbs, which are usually not listed as adjectives, though they are commonly used as such. – oerkelens Oct 17 '16 at 10:44
  • 2
    I find that particular example awkward, and I think most others would too. You could get the intended effect, while retaining the brevity, by rephrasing it as "those responsible" (as opposed to "the responsibles"). – Dan Bron Oct 17 '16 at 10:57
  • 1
    'The Responsibles' sounds like a computer-animated superhero film about lawyers, bankers, and chartered accountants. It's actually (capitalised) the name of a band. There are some examples of its use on the internet. As it is unusual, lacking context one has to guess at which sense of 'responsible' is involved. – Edwin Ashworth Oct 17 '16 at 11:03
  • Please list which dictionaries you found no listing in. – Edwin Ashworth Oct 17 '16 at 11:13
  • 2
    It is incredibly easy to write/say "those responsible" rather than "the responsibles" -- it's only two more letters. For this reason, there is very little "pressure" to "promote" responsible to noun status. – Hot Licks Oct 17 '16 at 12:34

TL; DR: You can use responsible as a noun, but use caution; it's not (yet) standard, and will likely not be well-received in most contexts.

Although this usage of responsibles is relatively recent, having adjectives that are also countable nouns isn't. Think of individual, elder, lovely, etc. The conversion process1 may also be more ubiquitous than we may imagine. Most of us probably distinguish recyclables from other trash, and you may also remember the recent film series The Expendables.

The conversion of an adjective to a countable noun does seem to be especially popular in a business setting. An early example is employables (and un-employables):

Under existing laws a man who can work on W. P. A. is considered to be employable; and employables, regardless of their actual employable status in relation to private business, are barred from relief benefits. (Hearing of the US Senate Committee on Appropriations, 1941)

Do you think there are groups who will always be unemployable? . . . If so, should the responsibility for un-employables rest with individual families or should they be given public assistance? (Omar Goslin & Helen Storen, American Democracy Today and Tomorrow, 1942. Possibly the text from a survey question.)

A very common, much more recent example is deliverables:

Deliverable is a term used in project management to describe a tangible or intangible product or service produced as a result of the project that is intended to be delivered to a customer (either internal or external). A deliverable could be a report, a document, a software product, a server upgrade or any other building block of an overall project. (Wikipedia)

Whether you are producing products for your customers or reports for your employees, your small business will have projects and those projects must have deliverables. (Miranda Morley, "Examples of Project Deliverables", Houston Chronicle's Small Business Chronicle, ND)

As a final note, I've seen many deliverables “rushed out the door” when time is tight and customers and/or clients are watching. (Bernie Roseke, "Make All Project Deliverables Count", Project Engineer, January 2016)

This is by no means an exhaustive illustration; these are just the first two words I thought of, and the first few examples I ran across.

But why do some adjectives make the jump to countable nouns, instead of only being used as mass nouns? I suspect it has to do with the desire to connect the adjective to particular instances. That is, "the unemployable" are a seething mass of non-individuals who share the characteristic of being unemployable; "unemployables" are individuals who are defined by their unemployability (at least in whatever context they are labelled this way).

In this case, responsibles are individuals who bear special responsibility for something. It might be handier to use this catch-all phrase than to specify which entities are responsible, for example if you wish to cover both individuals and departments or individuals at varying levels of authority or with different kinds of responsibility. As mentioned in comments, those responsible might also be less apropos if it wrongly implies causation.

Keeping all that in mind, it isn't a common usage, and I think the reaction of other commenters and answerers suggests that it would not be well-received outside of certain contexts. I would consider it an example of corporate-speak, which tends to be deprecated, at least until it enters the mainstream.

1 For an older example of the progression from adjective to countable noun, the word essential is first attested in the OED as an adjective, as early as c.1340. Essentials appears as a noun, solely in the plural form, in the seventeenth century, with the singular usage arising in the nineteenth. ("essential, adj. and n." OED Online. Oxford University Press, September 2016.) Nowadays it's literally countable: The 1 Essential, The 2 Essentials, 3 Essentials, etc.


While many, if not most adjectives can be used as nouns, they usually are in singular form, and are effectively collective nouns, often preceded by the definite article.

The race goes to the swift.

The good die young.

As noted in comments, the adjective effectively modifies an implied noun or pronoun, such as the swift [ones] or the good [people].

Adjectives can also be used as uncountable nouns

Pretty fades, but stupid is forever.

In your example, the better approach would be

He urged the responsible to take action.


When adjectives take the definite article to form a noun phrase, the adjective is always in the singular...the poor...the needy...the homeless etc. So, if at all RESPONSIBLE is to be used as a noun( which I personally find bizarre) , it should retain its singular form. Generally speaking, I think THE RESPONSIBLES sounds more poetic than grammatical.

  • I agree. "The responsibles" reminds me of The Incredibles. The latter an intentionally "poetic" movie title, but my context was anything but poetic. – Fiddlesticks Oct 17 '16 at 15:20

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.