The suffix ‑erior is used in many words that seem to indicate position:

  • superior
  • inferior
  • anterior
  • posterior

However, with my Google-fu, I can’t find a real definition or etymology.

What does ‑erior mean? From what language does it come?

  • 3
    There's nothing eerier than finding that the thing you wanted to ask about doesn't even exist!
    – ErikE
    Sep 29, 2010 at 21:41

1 Answer 1


Your Google-fu probably fails because the suffix is "-ior", not -"erior". For example, there are the words "excelsior", "senior", "junior".

The Concise Oxford Dictionary of English Etymology says:

-ior formerly also -iour — F. -ieur, † -iour — L. iōrem, nom. -ior, suffix of compar. of adj., as in anterior, exterior, inferior, interior, junior, posterior, senior, ulterior. In warrior the ending has another origin.

So, it comes from Latin via French.

  • 4
    However, in Latin I think it is justifiable to refer to a suffix "-erior", because that group of words (including "interior" and "exterior") are all positional, but the "-er" is etymological only for some of them. I suspect that apart from "superior", where the root is "super" (cf Greek "hyper", English "over") most of them include the I-E suffix "-tor/ter" meaning "one of two" (Lat "alter" = "one or other", "dexter" = "right hand"; Gk "heteros" = "other", "deuteros" = "second"; Russian "vtoroi" = second, English "other", "either"). "Inferior" and "ulterior" I suspect arose by analogy.
    – Colin Fine
    Dec 5, 2010 at 0:14
  • 1
    @ColinFine, the positive *ulter(us) is not attested in Latin, but it is the basis from which many derivations are formed, and it is indeed formed with the regular contrastive suffix *-(t)ero-, which is also the basis for the English comparative in -er (without the t). The same is true of inferus, which also has -er- in the root. I don’t think you can really posit an -erior suffix in Latin—all the words that end in -erior are fairly transparently a combination of *-(t)ero- + -ior. (Superior and inferior perhaps less so, synchronically.) Mar 4, 2014 at 13:28
  • 1
    If there is a form of the -ter suffix without a 't', then presumably it underlies the Latin comparative -ior as well.
    – Colin Fine
    Mar 4, 2014 at 19:08

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.