5

Imagine two people talking about politics, using rational arguments and philosophical theories, and suddenly a third one comes in and starts ranting about the same topic, but from a very subjective perspective.

Or else, someone posts a humorous, yet shallow picture on facebook, related to recent events, and someone else comments, but in a highly elaborated manner.

In general, a discussion could be led for example in an academic way, it could be pub talk, it could be over-emotionalised, childlike, silly, precocious, relaxed, it could be in the style of a BBC interview or a heated quarrel. I would call all these "discussion styles" in lack of a better term.

What is a word (or an expression) for changing the discussion style or conversation level in such a way? Or is there even a better word for "discussion style"? In particular, I'm looking for a technical term possibly used by linguists.

An example sentence for the first question might be "In facebook conversations between people of different educational levels, [?] are frequently observed.", and for the second question "Alice and Bob were discussing politics when suddenly Charlie came in and completely changed the [...]"

Note that I'm not looking for an idiom for changing the subject in a conversation. The subject should stay the same, only the way the conversation is led should change.

I am also not looking for a specific way how the discussion changed, like "escalation".

  • "change the debate" refers to style, arguments or approach rather than the subject of the conversation. – Graffito Aug 29 '16 at 11:05
  • 2
    "change the depth of the discussion" ? – Helmar Aug 29 '16 at 12:28
  • 1
    change the nature of the discussion, the discussion's course got altered ? – Nagarajan Shanmuganathan Aug 29 '16 at 12:41
  • 2
    @BradC escalate is nice, though obviously only works in one direction – Aoki Aug 29 '16 at 18:56
  • 1
    The opposite of a discussion "escalating" would be a discussion descending (or devolving) into chaos or perhaps "dissolving into an argument". You could also say a discussion "became heated". These are all detailed descriptions of exactly how the discussion changed, though, not a general term for a change in demeanor. – BradC Aug 29 '16 at 19:17
1

Change of tone, e.g. quoting The Times newspaper

Turning point will change the tone of debate [...] The death of an MP [Joe Cox 1974-2016] less than a week from the EU referendum has already had a profound effect on the course of the campaign


A definition of Tone:

4. Manner of expression in speech or writing: took an angry tone with the reporters.

5. A general quality, effect, or atmosphere: a room with an elegant tone.

American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language

  • The tone of a debate seems to me to be mainly related to the emotional content of the debate. – Turion Aug 29 '16 at 15:40
1

Divergence:

[A feature of speech in linguistics] When the register and stylistic aspects of the speaker becomes apparently different and incongruent during the course of a conversation.

The individual in this case would adjust his speech patterns to be distinct from those of other individuals belonging to another group/social identity.

*Divergence here can be understood as transient and individual/perosnal phenomena, as it is characterised by a creative choice deliberately made by the individual to reflect/represent his/her feelings in a given situation, at a given time.

[Note that, in other occasions, the same person may make an opposite or different choice freely, for quite logical reasons].

Discussion style= discourse style, speech style

  • So divergence occurs in a single speaker, and not in the relation between the discourse style of one speaker to the style of another? – Turion Aug 31 '16 at 8:38

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.