4

From my Webster's International dictionary of 1947 the Old English word 'blithe' is predated by the Gothic word 'bleith'. I am curious to know if the letters 'ei' are still pronounced the same in that ancient word as they are in modern English. Or by chance could the word have been pronounced 'blee-ith'. In a previous reading about 'ei' a scholar wrote that 'ei' came into use by combining words from Old French and Old English. And here is a Gothic word using this letter combination also. What say you?

  • 1
    It maybe that the Gothic word predates the English word, but it not likely descended from Gothic, more likely the relationship is avuncular than parental. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gothic_language – AllInOne Aug 19 '16 at 18:05
  • @AllInOne- I assumed that since the Goths were a group of Germanic Tribes dating back to the last centuries of the Roman Empire that the relationship between the Anglo-Saxons and the Goths was more parental, by evidence of such a close orthography in some of the words preserved down through the centuries. Are you saying that the Goths were more distant in relationship than parental? – D. Tom Bentz Aug 20 '16 at 14:34
5

There are a few confusing issues here.

For one thing, it's an oversimplification, or outright wrong, to say that "ei" came from combining Old French and Old English. I guess you may be talking about the answer to this question (Why is it true that “I before E, except after C”?)? I don't like that answer because it conflates modern languages (like German) and proto-languages, like Proto-Germanic. English is not descended from modern German. English is descended from Proto-Germanic, which is a reconstructed language that we have no direct evidence of (so there are no written texts in Proto-Germanic). There are some words spelled with "ei" that come from French, but by no means all of them: either, heifer, and feisty are of Germanic origin (which is, again, not the same thing as "German").

The other issue is the spelling of Gothic. Most of the Gothic documents we have were not written in the Latin alphabet. They were written in the Gothic alphabet. When your dictionary writes a Gothic word as bleith, that's a transliteration to make it easier for you to read the word. Also, your dictionary seems to have omitted the suffix -s that appeared on the nominative form of this word: most other sources I've found give it as bleiths. The way this actually looked in Gothic texts was more like 𐌱𐌻𐌴𐌹𐌸𐍃 (you'll be able to see that if you download a Gothic font to your computer).

The digraph 𐌴𐌹 (ei) in Gothic is believed to have represented the single long vowel sound /iː/, approximately the "ee" sound in English "bee." This spelling convention is derived from Greek (where the digraph ει came to represent the sound /iː/, later /i/ after the loss of vowel length) and has little to do with the modern English digraph "ei."

Overall, the word 𐌱𐌻𐌴𐌹𐌸𐍃 (bleiths) is though to have been pronounced something like /bliːθs/ "bleeths."

Here is a picture of the word "bleiths" from the Gothic text called the "Codex Argenteus," taken from The Codex Argenteus Online 188Lc. VI: 35-41. Ms. 144 v. I located the word by searching the Wikisource Gothic Bible.

enter image description here

  • @sumelic- Thank you so much for clarifying your answer to me. It is most helpful. You are right about bleith appearing actually as bleiths. I see that now. If I may could I expand my question to include the name 'Blitham'. It is a very rare name and I am also seeking for historical evidence to its origin. As a place name I found it in Lincolnshire county, England in the southwest section of the county being replaced by a village now named as 'Little Bytham'. Wandering also if their is anyone in the distant past who may have been noteworthy who possessed the name 'Blitham'. – D. Tom Bentz Aug 20 '16 at 15:21
  • @D.TomBentz: "Blitham" or "Blytham" looks like it might be derived from "Blithe" plus the common English place-name suffix "ham". However, I don't know if this is actually the case. – herisson Aug 20 '16 at 19:12
  • @sumelic- Thank you for all your help to my question. – D. Tom Bentz Aug 21 '16 at 2:33
  • @sumelic- In retrospect to my earlier question I thought to add the following source material for Blitham that may be part of the answer to its origin: from Orderic Vitalis 768 C; "Blidam totamque terram Rogerii de Bothleio cognati sui jure repetiit, et a rege grandi pondere argenti comparavit." from the book entitled, The Reign of William Rufus and the Assession of Henry I by Edward A. Freeman M.A. Honorary Fellow of Trinity College, Oxford at the Clarendon Press- 1882; pages 160-162. This may be a possible origin for the surname 'Blytham' as a place in Nottinghamshire, England. – D. Tom Bentz Sep 9 '16 at 4:41
1

From Wiktionary:

Old English bliþe IPA(key): /ˈbliːðe/

Blithe IPA(key): /blaɪð/

Blithe: (Etymonline)

  • Old English bliþe "joyous, kind, cheerful, pleasant," from Proto-Germanic *blithiz "gentle, kind" (source also of Old Saxon bliði "bright, happy," Middle Dutch blide, Dutch blijde, Old Norse bliðr "mild, gentle," Old High German blidi "gay, friendly," Gothic bleiþs "kind, friendly, merciful").

  • Rare since 16c. No cognates outside Germanic. "The earlier application was to the outward expression of kindly feeling, sympathy, affection to others, as in Gothic and ON.; but in OE. the word had come more usually to be applied to the external manifestation of one's own pleased or happy frame of mind, and hence even to the state itself." [OED]

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.