6

Consider the following sentence (modified from here):

It is now widely accepted that an archaeal host likely gave rise to the cell proper.

(Talking about eukaryotic origins.) What exactly the grammatical role of "proper" is here? Is "cell proper" standing for the concept of "a proper cell" and thus "proper" is a postnominal adjective? Or is it an adverb meaning "properly"? I have the feeling that the former is closer to the truth. I understand that words representing attributes can be positioned after the noun, for example:

  • money unspent
  • heir apparent
  • people unharmed
  • star visible
  • people responsible

though it seems to me that these are mostly verb derivatives that perhaps are shorthands for e.g.:

Every star (that is) visible (by an anonymous grammatical subject) is named after a famous astronomer.

Clearly, "proper" is not a verb and does not behave in this way. I'm sure I've encountred similar cases with other non-verbs, but unfortunately, nothing comes to my mind at the moment. Also, can you use "proper" (and related) any time postpositionally? Are these valid? If not, how should one cumulate adjectives with a postpositional attribute?

  • This is an argument proper.
  • This was a breakfast proper. (might be ok but too formal?)
  • This was an English breakfast proper. (doesn't sound right at all)
  • This was a breakfast English proper. (ugh)

So how is the very first example with "proper" to be understood? Is "proper" a special word that conveys some extra meaning here that I fail to grasp and which justifies its special position? Can someone provide some historical background and insight on this formula? Also, what other (non-verb) words can be used this way?

Please don't close this question being a duplicate of this or this because it isn't. I'm asking for the grammatical role of a specific part of the sentence, what kind of words can play this role (if not verb-derived) and why these particular words ended up with this somewhat special role. Unfortunately, the answers at How to tell if an adjective is attributive or predicative [EFL context]? are either simply stating the fact that it is a postpositive adjective form (with no further context) or list a few examples but with no explanation and background at all.

marked as duplicate by Edwin Ashworth, Peter Shor , Community Aug 4 '16 at 6:02

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

  • Good question, +1. I can't offer any syntactic analysis, but I can tell you what proper means modifying a noun like that. I was born and raised in Manhattan, which is part of the city proper, as opposed to those posers who were born and raised in Westchester and go around telling everyone they're "from New York" (by which they mean to imply the city, not the state). See also this ELL question which discusses the postpositive proper. – Dan Bron Aug 3 '16 at 14:09
  • Answered at [E Ashworth] How to tell if an adjective is attributive or predicative [EFL context]? An overview on postpositive adjectives appears at Why inspector general and not general inspector ... [again E Ashworth]. – Edwin Ashworth Aug 3 '16 at 14:14
  • my guess is that proper placed after the noun is a shorthand for "properly speaking" and that it's a borrowing from French. In French "proprement dit" (litteraly "Properly spoken") is used the same way and for the same reason (sort of saying "a true " something") – P. O. Aug 3 '16 at 14:16
  • 2
    "Proper" is one of a few adjectives that can occur both attributively and postpositively but with a difference in sense. Postpositive "proper" means 'in the strict sense of the term' and attributive "proper" means 'right', 'correct', 'true', 'fitting' and such like. – BillJ Aug 3 '16 at 14:27
  • I'd add that 'people responsible' is a whiz-deletion of 'people who are responsible'. Some examples, though, persist from the French (femme fatale, force majeure). / Also, you are correct that postnominal proper is unidiomatic in many if not all informal situations. – Edwin Ashworth Aug 3 '16 at 14:31