Consider the following statement:

If I were you, I would go to the doctor.

As far as I know, a modal verb or a past tense can be interchangeably adopted to express the subjunctive mood. It seems, however, that most subjunctive sentences commonly prefer to use a modal verb, rather than a past tense. In conclusion, my questions are

  • Is the following sentence grammatically correct?

    If I were you, I went to the doctor.

  • If so, what is the reason most people prefer to use a modal verb?

  • 2
    "If I were you, I went to the doctor" is not grammatical.
    – DyingIsFun
    Commented Jul 26, 2016 at 3:45
  • 1
    @Silenus If that's the case, why was it allowed for the subordinate clause to use a past tense, instead of a modal verb? It seems to me that the two clauses are the same in the sense that they are both in the subjunctive mood. Commented Jul 26, 2016 at 3:50
  • If the main clause uses the past tense, then it can't be subjunctive (counter-factual). The subordinate clause is "if I were you", and (since there is no modal there) it uses the past tense (in a quirky way, using 'were' regardless of person or number) to indicate the subjunctive -- looking sideways at a hypothetical universe that branched off from ours.
    – AmI
    Commented Jan 3, 2018 at 23:33

2 Answers 2


It's important here to distinguish between the preterite form of a verb, and the past tense meaning that is normally associated with the preterite form. The modal preterite use of some English verbs indicates modality, as the OP points out (not past time). For example, in

I wish you went to the doctor more often than you do.


If you went to the doctor tomorrow, I'd drive you.

...use of the preterite form of the verb (went) does not indicate past time.

To answer your question (why you can't say "If I were you, I went to the doctor"), English does not grammaticalize a generic concept of modality (nor does it have a robust grammatical category "subjunctive" as French does), but instead has several common constructions that can be used to convey different types of modality. The modal preterite construction cannot be used in the same situations as a modal auxiliary can. The modal preterite expresses modal remoteness, generally in one of the two types of constructions:

  • Conditional constructions. (e.g., If she injured herself, I'd rush to help.)
  • Expressing a counterfactual situation, but only in subordinate clauses which complement specific verbs that have an element of uncertainty in their meaning (e.g., wish, think).

Auxiliary verbs can be used to convey a larger range of modal meanings (with different auxiliaries having different modal meanings associated), some of which include remoteness. In a sentence like "I would go to the doctor (If I were you)," would expresses two types of modality: propensity (lexically) and remoteness (preterite form).


“If I were” is not past tense, it is subjunctive and refers to present or future time and is about a contrary to fact or hypothetical idea. The way to express the result clause is with “would” instead of “will.”

For example, real condition: If I am there, I will see you. Unreal/hypothetical/contrary to fact: If I were there (=I am not), I would see you (=I don’t see you or won’t see you because I’m not there.)

Sadly the present tense subjunctive is technically called “past subjunctive” in many authoritative sources so this causes some confusion. It is about present time. Past (time) subjunctive would be: If I had been there (=I wasn’t), I would have seen you. (=I didn’t see you.)

  • Hi Ellen, this would benefit from citing sources. Please do take a moment to see the help center and the EL&U tour, and welcome.
    – livresque
    Commented May 5, 2023 at 0:09

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.