1

I'm going to conduct an experiment. Before it I have a bunch of events which I expect to happen. I call them "expected events".

After the experiment was run, I have two kind of events: "expected" ones (those which happened while I waited for them) and "unexpected" (which happened but I didn't expect it).

There are two entities denoted by "expected events": those which I was expecting to happen in the future and those which have already happened and met my expectations. How could I deal with this naming clash?

[The question arose while I was writing a program, so it is more about naming entities in programming, but I think it is self-contained enough to be here.]

UPD: the name will be used in a program, so it should be short, not more than 2-3 words for entity.

  • you can use a synonym of expected such as anticipated event or awaited event to differentiate them. Or change event for results. Event carries a connotation of something in the future, even though it's been used since also for past things ( it meant "something to come"). So expected events for phase 1 and expected/unexpected results after the experiment is ov er. – P. O. Jul 22 '16 at 0:45
  • 1
    I would use "expected" for future events and "realized" for those which were both expected previously and turned out as you expected they would. – A.Ellett Jul 22 '16 at 2:09
  • @A.Ellett I like "realized" most, thank you. – Ivan Smirnov Jul 22 '16 at 12:53
1

For programming I would change it to "expected" (future) and "predicted" and "unexpected" (past).

  • Thanks, looks good enough. I'll accept the answer after waiting for other answers for a while. – Ivan Smirnov Jul 22 '16 at 0:38

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.