Some verbs can have double Ls in the gerund form; for example:

  • modeling; modelling
  • traveling; travelling

Which form should we use, or which form is used more in the literature?

  • There is only one way to spell spelling, and it is spelling. Oct 11, 2023 at 11:40

4 Answers 4


Actually, to my understading, the form with double l (e.g. "travelling") is more common in British English, while in American English the spelling would be with single l ("traveling").

It seems that Irish, Australian, NZ, and Canadian varieties generally prefer the (British) double l versions.

More information e.g. at the Wikipedia article on British/American spelling differences. (Do note that the opposite also happens: "there are words where British writers prefer a single l and Americans usually use a double l".)

So, there is no all-encompassing answer to "which form should we use" – it depends on the context and your preferences. Due to the sheer number of American English speakers, the single l versions are overall "more common in literature", of course. (But when deciding which you should use, do pay more attention to other factors, such as your geographical location or the preferences of your audience.)

  • 11
    Yes; in general, British (Commonwealth) English prefers a double 'l'. Or more accurately a double consonant: so travel -> travelling, but warble -> warbling.
    – njd
    Aug 9, 2010 at 16:10
  • 19
    The general rule in British English is to double the 'l'. The general rule in American English is to double the 'l' only when the last syllable is accented. So words like propelled are spelled with a doubled 'l' on both sides of the pond. Nov 15, 2011 at 14:56

See a great answer from Yahoo Answers

The singular "l" in traveled is unique to American spelling. This does NOT make it wrong. It is perfectly acceptable as is the double "l" in the British spelling of travelled,

The Oxford English Dictionary has a very good explanation that is not too far removed from the one you proffered to your friend

The ruling is :-

When you have a verb that ends in a vowel plus "L" and you are going to add an ending that begins with a vowel then you double the "L".

i.e., vowel + L + vowel = double LL. (travel + er = traveller)

Direct Quote below

In British spelling, verbs ending in a vowel plus l double the l when adding endings that begin with a vowel (e.g. travel, travelled, traveller). In American English the l is not doubled (travel, traveled, traveler).


This is the home page of "ask the experts" at Ask Oxford.com. Bookmark and it will assist you in other explanations for your friend,




-l- vs -ll-:

Both versions (-l- and -ll-) are correct and acceptable (when it comes in stressed syllable).

Modeling and traveling are more common the in U.S. (-ll- is also used and acceptable in the U.S.) while modelling and travelling are most commonly used in the UK and many other regions (-l- is also used and acceptable in the UK)

Doubling final consonants:

The last consonant often gets doubled in present participle and past participle when it's a part of stressed syllable or the construction is CVC (Consonant - Vowel - Consonant) where the vowels are represented with a single grapheme, not digraph.

Most of the CVC constructions do not follow CVC method rather, they follow stressed syllable method (usually multisyllabic words).

Explanation with examples:

1. In stressed syllable:

Consonants usually get doubled in stressed syllables.

When l is a part of stressed syllable, it gets doubled in both American English and British English.


  • Control -> controlling -> controlled.

(ll in both AE and BE because l is a part of stressed syllable).

  • Patrol -> patrolling -> patrolled (l is a part of stressed syllable).

2. CVC constructions:

Consonants often get doubled in CVC constructions (mostly monosyllabic and disyllabic).


  • Rob -> robbing -> robbed
  • Pin -> pinning -> pinned
  • Rip -> ripping -> ripped etc.

3. Unstressed syllable:

Consonant in unstressed syllable does not usually get doubled.

Example: - Target -> targeting -> targeted (here t is a part of unstressed syllable so it does not get doubled.)

The l in 'travel' is a part of unstressed syllable so it does not get doubled in present participle and past participle.

  • Travel -> traveling -> traveled.

However, in British English and many other dialects of English, the final l gets doubled even if it's a part of unstressed syllable.


  • Label -> labelling -> labelled
  • Travel -> travelling -> travelled
  • Model -> modelling -> modelled

(Here the l is a part of unstressed syllable yet it gets doubled.)

4. After digraphs and diphthongs:

The -l- after a digraph or a diphthong does not usually get doubled.


  • Prevail -> prevailed not prevailled.
  • Detail -> detailed not detailled.
  • Mail -> mailed not mailled.

Google Ngram results:

Words having -l- are more common than those with -ll-.

enter image description here


British English:

  • travel -> travelling - travelled.
  • label -> labelling - labelled.
  • cancel -> cancelling - cancelled.
  • model -> modelling - modelled etc.

American English:

  • travel -> traveling - traveled.
  • label -> labeling - labeled.
  • cancel -> canceling - canceled.
  • model -> modeling - modeled etc.

However, both forms are used in both AE and BE.

It's a general 'guideline' and not a 'rule'.

(This question (when to double final consonant) might be helpful.)


The rule is that if you have stress on the first syllable, but not the second one- travel, parcel, cancel etc (note: in all these words, the first syllable is stressed on, but the second one receives no stress, or less stress), you drop the second L if it is AmEn. So it’s- traveler, traveling, traveled; parceling, parceled; canceling, canceled. Otherwise, if the stress is on second syllable, but not the first- control, patrol etc, you retain the second L in AmEn- controlling, controlled; patrolling, patrolled.

  • 1
    That can't be the rule. What about "revelling"? Emphasis on the first word, but double L. Also, "travelling" is double L in British English.
    – Astralbee
    May 10, 2020 at 13:25
  • Counting syllables is easier done form the last one. A simple example (disheveled, stress on the "second" syllable, but still a single 'l' in AmE.) means you have to rewrite your whole answer. Also, maybe make clear what happens in BrE as well.
    – oerkelens
    May 10, 2020 at 13:29
  • Astralbee- British English follows the inverse rule, only for words with stress on first syllable. So that travel, parcel, cancel, revel etc., take such forms- traveller, travelling, travelled; parcelling, parcelled; cancelling, cancelled; reveller, revelling, revelled, re. For words with stress on second syllable, the spelling remains the same, as in case of American English. So that control, patrol etc, you again retain the second L- controlling, controlled; patrolling, patrolled.
    – rahulbsb
    Jun 19, 2020 at 17:26
  • oerkelens- You have a very valid point here. The word "dishevel" has 3 syllables, and the stress is, as you rightly point out, on the 2nd one. The trick here, in order to accommodate this ex into my stated rule above, is to think of the word- "di-she-vel" as one where the first syllable ought to be treated as an extra one. This ex. of yours is an extraordinary one. There must be some other words like this, I'm sure. To modify this verb in different forms, in AmEn, I've treated the syllable that comes right before the last one (with the singular letter L at the end), as the 1st syllable.
    – rahulbsb
    Jun 19, 2020 at 18:01
  • oerkelens- So that dishevel can be syllabically broken up as: (di)-she-vel. The parenthesized syllable ought to be treated as a hidden one, so that the "presumed first syllable" becomes the second one: "she". So that, in AmEn it takes such forms- disheveled, disheveling. In BritEn- dishevelled, dishevelling
    – rahulbsb
    Jun 19, 2020 at 18:07

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.