To start, would it be correct to say

"My ex-girlfriend used to eat at Red Lobster."


"My ex-girlfriend eats at Red Lobster."

Another example:

"My ex-girlfriend used to be into karate."


"My ex-girlfriend is into karate."

With these examples it feels like the past tense makes sense, but here's why this question came up:

"My ex-girlfriend was tall."


"My ex-girlfriend is tall."

Technically it's not possible for a person to change height, so one may argue that it should be "is tall," but looking at the red lobster example, it should be "was tall."

  • 5
    Malleable attributes can be was, while permanent attributes should be is.
    – KWinker
    Jun 28, 2016 at 2:02
  • 4
    I don’t see why the Red Lobster example demands past tense. You may be conflating “My gilrfriend ate at Red Lobster” with “My ex- girlfriend eats at Red Lobster” unless your ex-girlfriend refuses to eat there anymore since it reminds her of you or something.
    – Jim
    Jun 28, 2016 at 2:06
  • 2
    Why is it not simply "My ex-girlfriend was into karate", if you don't know whether she still is or not.
    – Hot Licks
    Jun 28, 2016 at 2:34
  • 2
    You might say "My current girlfriend is short, but my ex-girlfriend was tall." In this case the is/was relationship mirrors the current/ex relationship. But if you're simply describing your ex (and she's still alive), she is tall.
    – Hot Licks
    Jun 28, 2016 at 2:36
  • 1
    @TrevorD: As general advice, your comment is very sound; but in (much of) the U.S., Red Lobster is well known as a national chain of middle-brow restaurants, roughly on a par with Sizzler or Outback Steakhouse or Olive Garden or Macaroni Grill. In referring to these franchised operations, it's normal (at least where I live) to omit the "the."
    – Sven Yargs
    Jun 28, 2016 at 16:13

2 Answers 2


This question is difficult to answer succinctly because the more desirable wording to use may differ depending on the circumstances surrounding the statement.

Case 1: When Maybonne was your girlfriend, she often ate at Red Lobster. Now that she is your ex-girlfriend, she may or may not eat there. If you know that she still does, it makes sense to say "My ex-girlfriend eats at Red Lobster." If you don't know whether she still does, or if you know for a fact that she doesn't anymore, the more accurate statement would be "My ex-girlfriend used to eat at Red Lobster"—the implication being "When she was my girlfriend, she used to eat there." A stickler might insist that saying she used to do something implies that she doesn't anymore, but few English speakers insist on drawing that logical inference when dealing with a written statement, and even fewer insist on drawing it when dealing with extemporaneous speech.

Case 2: If, when Maybonne was your girlfriend, she was into karate, and that's what you're trying to say, "My ex-girlfriend used to be into karate" is a reasonable way to say it. It's true, again, that some hearers may infer from that wording that she is no longer into karate now that she isn't your girlfriend—but it is equally true that hearers might infer that the statement "My ex-girlfriend is into karate" indicates that karate is a hobby she took up only in her post-you career. In real life, a sophisticated English speaker might recognize and avoid possible misunderstanding on this point by expressing the idea along the lines of "After we broke up, my ex-girlfriend took up karate, and she's really into it now." But not everyone is so clear.

Case 3: If Maybonne is tall, obviously her status as a girlfriend or an ex-girlfriend doesn't alter that fact, any more than it alters the fact that she is from Missouri (let's say). But in this case, use of the past tense produces an odd effect. By identifying her as your ex-girlfriend, you assign her a current status: she is, right now, your ex-girlfriend, and her height and state of origin are, as KWinkler observes in a comment above, permanent attributes. So there is something slightly morbid about saying, "My ex-girlfriend was tall, and she was from Missouri." But no such sense attaches to the seemingly very similar statement, "My first girlfriend was tall, and she was from Missouri." That's because "first girlfriend was" puts Maybonne's status in the past and indeed may be necessary to avoid suggesting that your first girlfriend and your current girlfriend are one and the same person. If you say "My first girlfriend is tall, and she is from Missouri," the implication is that your current girlfriend is your first girlfriend—though the wisdom of referring to her in this manner is perhaps as dubious as referring to your current wife as "my first wife" when she is the only wife you've had.

Whether to use past tense or present tense in describing the activities and characteristics of a person you've identified as your ex-girlfriend depends on the rather subtle distinction between whether you mean "my ex-girlfriend today" or "my ex-girlfriend, back when she was my girlfriend." People tend to express themselves more loosely on this point than a strictly logical person might wish them to, but fortunately you're not operating in a vacuum: clues from nearby sentences should provide hearers or readers with the necessary context to understand your intended meaning.

  • Case 1 reminds me of a Mitch Hedberg line: "I used to do drugs. I still do, but I used to, too." Depending on the context, the statement that "X used to do Y" can imply "X no longer does Y" quite strongly. Jul 26, 2017 at 19:47

I am not an expert, but this is what I feel...

If you know she is still doing it then use present tense. If you have been broke up since very long and you don't know her whereabouts or you are not sure if her habits have changed over the time, use past tense. Using past tense here just acts as a disclaimer that when you knew her she was doing that.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.