This question already has an answer here:

I used the term "poor man's ____" to talk about a less expensive but less useful alternative. One of my colleagues called me out that some people might find it offensive. Is there another term I could use instead?

marked as duplicate by Jason S, GoldenGremlin, Dan Bron, Ste, DJClayworth Jun 8 '16 at 17:00

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

  • more economical – GoldenGremlin Jun 8 '16 at 16:40
  • 1
    If I could upvote you again for being cool enough to not only search for, but announce the duplicate of your question, I would. – Dan Bron Jun 8 '16 at 16:43
  • Budget-friendly alternative – NVZ Jun 8 '16 at 16:56
  • Budget-friendly, economical, all are good, politically correct terms. You could even just say 'a cheaper X'. – Rome_Leader Jun 8 '16 at 16:57
  • Tell this colleague that you're offended that he would consider poverty in itself offensive. Then start hanging out with better colleagues. – deadrat Jun 8 '16 at 18:32

You might like chintzy:

Did you try out ProductVal? I hear it's basically a chintzy ProductPlus.

Source: Merriam Webster

  • Please quote the relevant definition here and then cite the source. – NVZ Jun 8 '16 at 16:53
  • Chintzy has a rather different meaning in BrE: "Of, like, or decorated with chintz: 'a pretty, chintzy fabric'". Consequently I didn't initially understand this suggestion at all! – TrevorD Jun 8 '16 at 16:58
  • The connotation of the word "chintz" has changed over time. I've just been reading Stephen Yafa's "Cotton: The Biography of a Revolutionary Fiber" and it originally referred to a type of fabric from India with hand-painted designs, which became fashionable in Europe in the 1600s. Not sure when it became synonymous for gaudy or low-quality. (edit: this source says one of George Eliot's works in 1851.) – Jason S Jun 8 '16 at 21:51

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.