Definition of Kelvin: The kelvin is the primary unit of temperature measurement in the physical sciences, but is often used in conjunction with the Celsius degree, which has the same magnitude. Subtracting 273.16 K from the temperature of the triple point of water (0.01 °C) makes absolute zero (0 K) equivalent to −273.15 °C (−459.67 °F). (source https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kelvin)

In this definition, Celsius is capitalized but kelvin is not?

Which is correct?

  • It may be because kelvin is used as is whereas Celsius can not be used alone but comes with degree. I'll try to find a source of some sort. – Thomas Francois Jun 3 '16 at 15:56
  • There is a very nice answer over here: Should Units of Measure be capitalized? – Thomas Francois Jun 3 '16 at 16:00
  • @ThomasFrancois - I don't think this is a duplicate since it's about the special case with Celcius and Fahrenheit which appear to contradict the general rule that units should not be capitalised (which is explained in one of the answers to that question, but isn't the focus of the question). – Max Williams Jun 3 '16 at 16:03
  • @MaxWilliams Not an exact duplicate indeed, but this contradiction is covered in the answer I pointed to. – Thomas Francois Jun 3 '16 at 16:07
  • @ThomasFrancois no argument there, and that other question does go into the subject in quite a lot of detail, so, OP, you should definitely go and read it. – Max Williams Jun 3 '16 at 16:11

The confusion here stems from the fact that "Celsius" is not the name of the unit, rather it is a classifier for the unit "degree," of which there is also "Fahrenheit." Because "Celsius" and "Fahrenheit" are names (Anders Celsius and Daniel Fahrenheit), they remain capitalized.

However, a "kelvin" is a unit just like "meter" or "gram," which, despite being named after someone (Lord Kelvin), is spelled lowercase, just like all SI units named after someone (c.f. "watt," "hertz").

Wikipedia's entry on SI units explains this clearly:

Names of units follow the grammatical rules associated with common nouns: in English and in French they start with a lowercase letter (e.g., newton, hertz, pascal), even when the symbol for the unit begins with a capital letter. This also applies to "degrees Celsius", since "degree" is the unit.

(It goes on to explain that they are capitalized in German, because that's how German works. But your question isn't about German.)

Note that "degrees Kelvin" is not correct. Celsius and Fahrenheit are "degrees" because 100° C is not twice 50° C, nor is 100° F twice 50° F (in fact, that hardly makes sense).

But because 0 K is absolute zero, 100 K is twice 50 K, just like how 100 m is twice 50 m, which means the Kelvin scale is not a degree scale. (Oddly, note that "Kelvin" is capitalized here because it is functioning as an adjective modifying "scale," so is capitalized just like "American" would be. It's just the unit that isn't capitalized. Whew.)

(I'll confess, I don't entirely understand this myself, but that's how it was explained to me.)

Even though "kelvin" is not capitalized, its abbreviation is, to distinguish it from the SI prefix "kilo-," which is k: "kg," "km."

See also Wikipedia's entry on "Kelvin."

| improve this answer | |
  • But you wouldn't capitalize "on the meter scale" (as silly as it sounds) or "in the gram system" so not sure why you'd capitalize Kelvin in that case? – JeopardyTempest Jun 9 '17 at 11:38
  • 1
    I believe it comes from it being named directly after Kelvin, not being a later construct of "kelvin" + "scale." – Azor Ahai -- he him Jun 9 '17 at 16:14

Both are correct.

I believe the difference is due to that fact that Celsius isn't the actual unit - the unit is called a "degree". Since we have two different ways of measuring temperature in units called "degrees", we distinguish between them with the name of the creator of the system - "Celsius" or "Fahrenheit". These are proper nouns, and so are capitalised. The units themselves (which are usually named after people), aren't capitalised.

So, if we were talking about Lord Kelvin, who gave his name to the kelvin unit of temperature, we capitalise his name, but with the unit itself we don't (as seen in this very sentence).

This gets a bit confusing, appearing to contradict the "a name not a unit" explanation, when people say "60 Fahrenheit" or "40 Celsius", etc - really this is shorthand for "60 degrees Fahrenheit" or "40 degrees Celsius".

EDIT - on a side note, you will sometime see people use "290 degrees Kelvin" - I believe that this is acceptable, even though it's not the official unit. If you do use it like this, capitalize "Kelvin". So, you can say

290 kelvin


290 degrees Kelvin

Stick to the former, though, since it's the standard.

| improve this answer | |

Newspaper style, at least in Canada, used to be that the unit was capitalized if named after a person. So Kelvin is capitalized, not centigrade. But then, I have never seen volt (named after Mr. Volta) capitalized, or ampere, (named after Ampere). So no definitive response!

| improve this answer | |
  • This is a very good answer; it only needs some background information and supporting references for this particular usage. – Bread Apr 5 '18 at 21:26

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.