I came across this post on Facebook:

"Well, if it makes you feel any better..."

It doesn't, and nor do I think you intended it to.

Can "nor" be used after "and" like that? Doesn't look right to me.

Personally, I would go with:

It doesn't, nor do I think you intended it to.

  • 3
    I'm with you. Nix to and nor. – Dan Bron Jun 2 '16 at 15:39
  • 1
    I believe in AmE, "and + nor" is not really acceptable. It's heard in BrE fairly often, though more so with "neither", as in I doesn't, and neither do I think ... – BillJ Jun 2 '16 at 17:33
  • Perfectly commonplace and unremarkable to me. Nor is semantically equivalent to not… either, and in cases where the latter would require a coordinator, that coordinator can be added before nor as well. If it’s a but, it’s even required: “It’s not good, but not is it bad” really doesn’t work the same without but. – Janus Bahs Jacquet May 9 '19 at 20:40
  • To this Brit, either form is acceptable. When spoken, I think the latter (without "and") requires a longer break/pause than does the and form. – TrevorD May 9 '19 at 22:49

No. "Nor" is a conjunction, like "and". You wouldn't say "and and" or "but and"

| improve this answer | |
  • 1
    Sorry, Bob, I made a typo. Here it is again: When combined with the coordinator "and", "nor" is best regarded as a connective adverb – BillJ Jun 2 '16 at 17:37
  • In AmE, I gather it's rare. But in BrE it's heard sometimes, though "neither" is more common: The Germans haven't replied and nor/neither have the French. – BillJ Jun 2 '16 at 17:40
  • This is the second time today that "(primarily UK)" has bit me in the butt. :) You're correct. – Bob Stout Jun 2 '16 at 17:40
  • But ... but ... but ...! – Hot Licks May 7 '19 at 23:55

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.