English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It only takes a minute to sign up.
Sign up to join this community
I am a non-native speaker wondering which of the following sentences would read more naturally to a native speaker:
The market looked like it had been the scene of a mass murder.
The market looked like it had been scene to a mass murder
I'm also unsure about the article before 'scene'. Is it absolutely necessary or could I omit it as seen in the second example (given that I'm okay with an informal tone to my text)?
If you definitely wanted to use the word scene, then your first example is correct and your second incorrect.
You could, however, say
The market looked like it had been witness to a mass murder.
making sure to leave the article out. To say that the market looked like it had been "the witness of a mass murder" or would be either incorrect or at least very strange—certainly a phrase that would make the reader go, hunh? Using "the witness to a mass murder" would be less problematic, but it would still be strange—in other words, it's not grammatically incorrect; it's just not what people say.
