1

I'm puzzled by an example given in Garner's Modern English Usage illustrating correct use of the subjunctive mood. In this example, Garner offers both the incorrect and the correct usage: "But the truth is, if it wasn't [read hadn't been] for a last-minute infusion of cash by an out-of-state lobbying group, the initiative would not have even garnered enough signatures to qualify for the ballot."

Is hadn't been used here because of some grammatical relationship with would not have later in the sentence? I would have expected weren't to replace wasn't here (not hadn't been).

Many thanks for any insight.

  • It would help if you laid your question out so that it is quite clear what the correct and incorrect versions are and which word is supposed to be subjunctive. Also a link to Garner's Modern English Usage (I'd never heard of it) would be in order, even if it is only to Amazon. – David May 17 '16 at 21:10
  • @R.Feit: Never watched Scooby Doo? "And I would have gotten away with it, too, if it hadn't been for you meddling kids!" Sounds fine to me. Past counterfactual vs present counterfactual. – curious-proofreader May 18 '16 at 3:59
1

This will perhaps be clearer if you recast it a little to sidestep the it ... BE for VERBing idiom. That will give something like this:

If an out-of-state lobbying group ___ (not infuse) cash, the initiative would not have garnered enough signatures to qualify.

Would ... have garnered in the consequence clause is clearly both counterfactual and past-tense, and since we're dealing with an actualization conditional the construction of infuse at "__" in the condition clause must likewise be both counterfactual and past-tense. Use of a past-tense verbform (infused in the positive, but did infuse in the negative) would express non-past counterfactuality:

* If an out-of-state lobbying group did not infuse cash, the initiative would not have garnered enough signatures to qualify.

To shift a past-form verb expressing counterfactuality into past-tense reference, we employ the perfect construction as a past marker:

If an out-of-state lobbying group had not infused . . .

In the same way, If it weren't for... provides only the modality shift; you need If it hadn't been for... to shift both tense and modality.

However, it must also be observed that this degree of grammatical precision is more than most people practise or demand in any but the most formal discourse; If it weren't for... will go unremarked in ordinary speech.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.