I may not be incorrect in my knowledge about speech, but Dialects or accents that drop sounds from words, syllables from words, or just completely change the sound from words are they correct?

I see pronunciation in the dictionary so by default I assume that is a correct way to pronounce words. Though this may be faulty reasoning.

I've heard many people say that there are millions of way to pronounce something yet whenever I open a dictionary I see the break down on the "standard" way to pronounce words

So I'm wondering if a dialect veers from the standard then are those speaking it speaking correct English?

If an accent veers from a dialect's standard then are those speaking it speaking correct English?

This may just be a lack of understanding on my part but I endeavor to learn more.

closed as primarily opinion-based by sumelic, tchrist, user140086, Rand al'Thor, TimLymington May 6 '16 at 21:10

Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • What do you mean by "correct"? If there were "incorrect" accents, why would it matter? – sumelic May 2 '16 at 12:42
  • I mean is there an agreed upon standard in terms of pronunciation. Do letters/letter combinations always make the same sound according to the syntax of the English language. Whether it matters or not is unimportant to me just curious. – SCFi May 2 '16 at 12:45
  • 1
    It depends on whose agreement you're seeking. – Hot Licks May 2 '16 at 12:46
  • 1
    "Standard" is not the same thing as "correct" (and "non-standard" is not the same thing as "incorrect"). For example, Norwegian has two main written standards. From what I've heard, it doesn't really have spoken standards. People speak in regional dialects. These are not standardized, but they are not considered "incorrect" either. So you should separate these two concepts. – sumelic May 2 '16 at 12:51
  • 1
    A standard is just... standard. Standards specify one way of doing something (or a small number of ways). They don't define what is "proper." For example, "standardized tests" are called that because they're administered in the same, standard way to all students, not because they're the One Proper Way to test students. Other kinds of tests are not "incorrect." – sumelic May 2 '16 at 12:58

With regard to the concept of 'correctness' of individual language elements, there are two competing views and these two views will affect how to differentiate varieties.

There is describing scientifically what is out there, what people actually say and how their individual way of speaking can be categorized with others, and then there is systematizing variation, stipulating rules, limiting varieties out of standardizing communication or esthetics.

The first is called descriptivism, the second prescriptivism. Prescriptivism is very much centered on recognizing a single standard; phenomenon X is either 'correct' or not with respect to that single standard. Descriptivism is much more lenient with respect to alternatives and varieties; many varieties can be recognized. Different social registers, ethnicities, localities tend to have within their group consistency such that phenomenon Z is indicative of someone being in a particular group (descriptivists could conceivably use the term 'correct' just allowing many more variations or alterations within a variety). For either -ism, there is a concept of 'this is a phenomenon, but that is not'. However the term 'correct' is socially laden with judgement of other varieties.

'Correctness' is the term used prescriptively for a given standard. Because scientifically there are general groups of people, there are many possible standards. There is a explicit social attempt at imposing standards (dictionaries, schools, media editors, government sanctioned academies). Many people will say that an Appalachian dialect is not 'correct' when writing newspaper articles, but using "ain't" is 'correct' or 'preferred' when speaking in that variety.

It seems strange to use the word 'correct' for an entire dialect. Is Australian English 'incorrect'? Of course not. Is Appalachian? Well, if you're writing a paper for a conference, it's probably a poor choice for understandability by the conference population.

A dictionary entry displays what should be said and is very likely the most common method for a particular variety (for most English dictionaries, it will be either American or British English).

To answer your question more directly, it feels inappropriate to use the term 'correct' for a given dialect out of many. The preferred way of saying it is 'This variety is preferred' and 'Phenomenon X is by far the most common and is accepted as standard (for this particular variety)'.

If you are a school teacher or newspaper editor (who normally only deal with one variety), then you can say 'Phenomenon X is correct'.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.