I would like to ask if the following sentence is grammatically correct because apparently two relative clause was used successively without any relative pronoun or whatever it is that sentence needs.
An eighteen-year-old Ballina man who drove his car at another youth resulting in him being flung onto the roof of the car was given a five year suspended sentence at last week’s sitting of Castlebar Circuit Court.
If I disperse :
The following relative clause
...who drove his car at another youth resulting in him being flung onto the roof of the car...
was used before the main verb "was given" in the sentence. While the part "man who drove his car at another youth" is the first relative clause simple and understandable, I could not understand the second one "resulting in him being flung onto the roof of the car" how the writer connected these two parts before main verb .