8

I am looking for a word or phrase to communicate someone who has committed what amounts to crimes against humanity, but who is not a politician or a soldier or military leader.

I want to describe the rubber barons (not robber barons) who exploited people in the Amazon basin at the turn of the 20th century. Not only did they enslave indigenous people to collect latex, but they also kept sex slaves, trafficked in human beings, drove out populations, murdered people, razed villages, etc. Here is a brief reference.

Someone who does this things might be called a war criminal, but these rubber barons were not military leaders, nor was there a war.

The term "slave driver" comes to mind, but slave-holding is not the limit of what they did, and also it has the connotation of a boss or overseer who simply works their employees too hard.

One might call them a "monster" or similar name, but that doesn't indicate the scale or specificity of their evil deeds.

Is there an apt phrase that would indicate the situation?

  • Not really a good word for that, I'm thinking. "Butcher" is about the best I can do. – Hot Licks Mar 17 '16 at 2:10
  • despicable comes to mind... – Jim Mar 17 '16 at 2:25
  • 1
    Capitalist thugs? Soulless profiteers? – Doug Glancy Mar 17 '16 at 2:39
  • In some languages the word for "executioner" can also be used to describe a cruel person who mistreats others. For instance French bourreau or Russian палач. English seems to lack a counterpart word. Perhaps "oppressor", "tormentor", or "tyrant". – ghostarbeiter Mar 17 '16 at 2:40
  • 1
    A brief time in the google find that the deaths of indigenous people during the Amazon rubber boom totaled in the tens of thousands. If you listen closely, you can hear the ghost of King Leopold II of Belgium scoffing. He was responsible for the deaths of somewhere between 1M and 15M people in his fiefdom of the Congo. No one knows the number because he had the records burnt before he turned the territory over to the government of his country. – deadrat Mar 17 '16 at 8:55
1

I would use enslaver rather than slave driver, and also exploiter possibly in combination with an adjective like monstrous.

1

The are capitalists. Their mistreatment of human beings came from the fact that they viewed those human beings as capital with a lower monetary value than the rubber. They did not recognize any social value in the people they abused. Only capital has value to capitalists.

You might be used to capitalists who are restrained by socialist laws like equal rights, minimum wage, maximum working hours, and so on. The rubber barons were not restrained by those laws. However, even in countries with those socialist traditions — like the United States — we still see indigenous people being driven off land because of mining, we still see sex slaves, we still see human rights abuses whenever people are viewed primarily as capital.

It is tempting to call the rubber barons “monsters” and try to separate ourselves from them. However, the truth is even worse: their kind of behavior is typical if it is not prevented by laws and customs that recognize social value and human dignity. Not just then but also today. That is why, for example, you hear Pope Francis preaching against “the evils of unfettered capitalism.” That is why U.S. Presidential Candidate Bernie Sanders is running on a platform of strengthening democratic socialism in the United States as a counterbalance to the unrestrained capitalism that is destroying the global environment and causing massive social problems.

  • Corrupt corporations and people can come from any form of government or country. – Skooba Mar 17 '16 at 20:56
1

Several good suggestions have been offered in the comments above, including "capitalist thugs" and "soulless profiteers" (Doug Glancy), "oppressor" and "tyrant" (ghostarbeiter) and "despot" or "tyrant" (Jesse M.).

I generally use the term capitalist whore instead of capitalist thug, but, of course, many people will complain that that term is obscene. (Ironically, the people who complain about it the loudest are people who are actually working for the capitalist whores.)

I'm not intimately familiar with the story of the rubber barons, but they might be described as imperialists, especially if they were based in or closely tied to the U.S. or Europe. The term Yankee imperialists is often applied to corrupt entities based in the U.S.

You might also incorporate the term colonial (e.g. "colonial pigs"), especially if Brazil was still a colony when the reign of the rubber barons began. Even if Brazil was already a sovereign state, the rubber barons might be seen as a legacy of colonialism, which exists even today. The term plantation master can have a similar connotation.

Another possibly useful term is monster.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.