2

I'm wondering if one can use the word "aggregation" to mean a team or a collaboration of sorts, or even a certain collection of individuals in general, not just objects. Any thoughts?

1
  • 1
    Cohort can be a useful word here, particularly in statistical discussions.
    – Fattie
    Jun 23, 2011 at 19:50

3 Answers 3

2

Aggregation can certainly be used to mean a collection of individuals.

I will note that, in my mind at least, aggregation tends to imply a level of disorganization or heterogeneity that I think somewhat conflicts with the idea of a formalized team. So, while it works well for an ad hoc collaboration working towards a particular end, I probably wouldn't use it for a group that is otherwise already entangled.

0
3

In a word, yes.

Here's one of the definitions according to the OED:

4. concr. A whole composed of many particulars; a mass formed by the union of distinct particles; a gathering, assemblage, collection.

And from the quotations:

1638 Chillingworth Relig. Prot. i. ii. §142. 107 The Church being nothing else but an aggregation of Believers.

2

In a word, no.

While aggregation can technically be used to describe a group of individuals, in common modern usage it only describes a group of objects.

Simon Jester's second example shows a usage of the word that has generally gone out of style.

Language is an ever-evolving animal, and majority usage rules – even if the dictionary tells you otherwise. Dictionaries are outdated almost the moment they are published, especially in this day and age. (Opinion)

If you must use aggregation to describe a group of individuals, try focusing on a quality (i.e. object) that the group shares, e.g.

... an aggregation of the writers' skills.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.