0

I've always understood that splitting infinitives should be avoided; e.g., instead of

To boldly go where no man has gone before.

use

To go boldly where no man has gone before.

With that in mind, I recently saw someone post the following comment on Facebook:

This is horribly written.

It struck me that a phrasing that sounds more natural to my ear is

This is written horribly.

In trying to determine why I prefer the latter, I realized that the adverb horribly splits the conjugated verb is written. Is this just personal preference, or is this "split conjugation" basically the equivalent of a split infinitive?

2
  • 4
    There's nothing wrong with the so-called 'split infinitive": "To boldly go" is far more natural than "to go boldly", and perfectly grammatical. Inserting the adverb "horribly" between"is" and "written" is not 'splitting the conjugation', as you call it; it's not slitting anything - they are separate constituents. Many adverbs have a lot of freedom when it comes to position. It's a free choice between "is horribly written" and "is written horribly", though I prefer the former. Both are grammatically fine.
    – BillJ
    Feb 11 '16 at 21:11
  • I might also argue that "written" could be considered an adjective in the example sentence given, rather than part of the verb. Feb 11 '16 at 21:24
2

Both of these types of 'splitting' are perfectly understandable, and therefore acceptable. (I just did one.)

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.