1

Is there a single word to describe when something is sorted in "order of appearance"?

Bibliographies are often sorted like this. Names of actors/actresses in a movie sometimes are, too.

This is in contrast to how an index is usually sorted [ie alphabetically].

As an example, I might say:

The definitions below are given in _ order.

sorted: organized, arranged

appearance: the act of becoming visible

bibliography: a list of books referred to in a scholarly work

alphabetically: ordering where strings are placed in order based on the position of characters in the conventional ordering of an alphabet

7
  • "Order of appearance" has about 3.3m Google hits, I would feel comfortable assuming that's the de facto standard.
    – Myron
    Jan 30, 2016 at 0:18
  • 1
    (Not single words) classified by order of appearance, listed in the order of their occurence, sorted in the order in which they appear in the document,
    – Graffito
    Jan 30, 2016 at 0:34
  • 2
    Isn't this simply "not sorted"?
    – Tim Ward
    Jan 30, 2016 at 2:03
  • 1
    I kinda get this vision of a manager handing his secretary a stack of index cards and saying, "Here, sort these cards in order of appearance."
    – Hot Licks
    Jan 30, 2016 at 2:23
  • 1
    (Arguably something ordered by appearance is not an "index" but rather a "table of contents".)
    – Hot Licks
    Jan 30, 2016 at 2:24

3 Answers 3

2

I tried to look for some examples; here are some from the "ShareLaTeX knowledge base." Often there are index numbers in bibliographies like this; in that case, you could say it is "in numeric order." (the term is used this way here: Biblatex bibliography styles, and here: Tips on Writing a Thesis in LaTeX) In fact, since you did not use any kind of in-line citations connecting your definitions to the previous occurrences of the word, it took me a minute or two to realize what you were doing in your question.

The default behavior listed on this page for the "none" sorting option describes this by saying "entries are processed in citation order." That term is also used in this question: Sort thebibliography by citation order. I don't know if it's used outside of the TeX community.

As others have mentioned, it's common to use a phrase to describe this, even when in explicit contrast with "alphabetic" (Example: "how could Mellel know if the order should be alphabetic or by order of occurrence?" found on a forum about Mellel) and an extra word or two seems in my opinion a small price to pay for increased clarity.


Example of how your question could be written if the definitions were listed in numerical order:

Is there a single word to describe when something is sorted1 in "order of appearance"2?

Bibliographies3 are often sorted like this. Names of actors/actresses in a movie sometimes are, too.

This is in contrast to how an index is usually sorted [ie alphabetically4].

As an example, I might say:

The definitions below are given in numerical order.

  1. sorted: organized, arranged

  2. appearance: the act of becoming visible

  3. bibliography: a list of books referred to in a scholarly work

  4. alphabetically: ordering where strings are placed in order based on the position of characters in the conventional ordering of an alphabet

1
  • I really like this answer. I've also heard "in reference order" for bibliographies but wasn't sure if that was commonly used or not.
    – wrhall
    Feb 1, 2016 at 22:50
2

I believe it would be more commonly worded as "listed in order of appearance", rather than "sorted".

Google Ngram seems to agree. "Sorted in order of appearance" is not found.

But I'm not aware of a single word for this kind of sorting.

2

If you treat appearances as time dependent events, you are listing the things according to their associated event times.

This implies the order is chronological.

: arranged in the order that things happened or came to be
Merriam-Webster

However, I would find it strange for someone to describe it that way. Order of appearance seems clear and well understood.

If a film has an ensemble cast with no clear lead role, it is traditional to bill the participants alphabetically or in the order of their on-screen appearance.
Wikipedia

2
  • 2
    If I were told a certain bibliography was sorted in "chronological order," I'd expect the entries to be arranged based on the dates when the cited documents were published.
    – herisson
    Jan 30, 2016 at 2:29
  • 1
    The chronology of course depends on the point of reference. Mysteries of the space-time continuum.
    – jxh
    Jan 30, 2016 at 2:31

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.