The word wavelength has the figurative usage with allusion to radio reception, implying (mutual) understanding especially in the idiomatic phrase to be on the same wavelength (as someone else).

What idiom was used before "to be on the same wavelength"?

OED's earliest citation for the figurative usage of wavelength is from 1927:

Have one's wave length, know one's sentiments.

American speech (American Dialect Society)

Another idiom that comes to mind is to be on the same page but interestingly it has a later original date than to be on the same wavelength in OED:

‘He..finally told me what page he was on’. ‘Is it th' same page you thought it was?’]

1965 H. Rhodes Chosen Few 179

OED gives a cross reference to the following idiom from the idiom to be on the same page:

to sing the same song (also tune) and variants: (of a number of people) to express the same view, to say the same thing; (also, esp. in to sing from the same hymn (also song) sheet) to present a united front, esp. by being seen publicly to agree. Freq. in political contexts.

The idiom singing the same song predates both idioms mentioned above but the meaning and the usage are a bit different.

Here is OED's earliest citation from 1846:

Priests, greybeards, Braccios, women, boys and spies, All in one tale, each singing the same song, How thou must house, and live at bed and board.

R. Browning Luria iv, in Bells & Pomegranates No. 8. 15/2

Can we say that to sing the same song is the earlier form of to be on the same wavelength? or is there any other idiomatic phrase that was used in the past for the same meaning (perhaps along the same lines of the idiom to be on the same wavelength where there is a figurative usage)?

  • 1
    "See eye to eye" is another well-worn phrase, but early uses (like translations of Isaiah) mean to see in person rather than to think the same way. I don't have any research on how that shift occurred, but maybe someone has done it or seen it and will share.
    – jejorda2
    Jan 18, 2016 at 21:40

3 Answers 3


The idiom "of the same mind" long predates "on the same wavelength."

...complete my joy by being of the same mind, having the same love, being in full accord and of one mind. [Philippians 2:2, ESV]

  • Hmm, simple as that. I didn't think it as an idiomatic phrase somehow. I was thinking of a figurative usage of a physical thing.
    – ermanen
    Jan 18, 2016 at 18:58

I’m sure that many of the hits on this ngram are for literal uses of the two phrases searched, but it shows that “on the same wavelength” first appeared around 1920 (not too long after Hertz’s work on wavelengths in the 1880s) and took-off around 1960.

Prior to that, “on the same track,” from its first appearance around the time of the first steam engine tramway locomotive in 1804 until it was surpassed by “wavelength” in/around 1970, was used more often than “on the same wavelength.”

Although probably not the best of references to cite, this thread from “WordReference/com” makes a connection between “… same wavelength,” “… same track,” and even “… same page,” seeming to conclude that all three mean: "understanding each other, communicating clearly."


I was thinking about "to be in sync" but was not very sure about its etymology. I explored a bit and found an idiomatic expression - in phase that redirected from "in sync"

According to the Free Dictionary

Also, in sync. In a correlated or synchronized way; in accord, in harmony.

For example,

If everyone were in phase we could step up the schedule

John and Pat often say the same thing at the same time; their minds are perfectly in sync .

Both versions of this idiom refer to physical phenomena. The first, dating from the second half of the 1800s, alludes to being at the same stage in a series of movements. The second, a slangy abbreviation of synchronization dating from the mid-1900s, alludes to exact coincidence in the time or rate of movement.

Therefore, according to the timelines given, "in phase" could have been used much before "on the same wavelength". Ngram seems to validate this claim.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.