How best to say this?

I can think of "carelessly" or "throwaway" but suppose the following sentence:

"Such clichés are often used with little thought"

Is there a better way to say this? Something in my mind keeps nagging that there is. The implication I want to evoke is that the clichés are overused, often without real understanding of what is being said.

  • 2
    Empty, vapid, void, platitudes (platitudinous), or the more specific and pejorative thought-stopping cliche (or thought-terminating cliche). – Dan Bron Jan 10 '16 at 17:11
  • 1
    I call it using a cliché. Using clichés, like Belloc's water-beetle's walking on water, is something you can only really do if you are not thinking about it. – Brian Donovan Jan 11 '16 at 1:52
  • @MarkHubbard see most of the pop charts – Max Williams Jun 9 '16 at 9:39
  • Good point, Max. Who can argue with (financial) success? :-) – Mark Hubbard Jun 9 '16 at 14:07

You might be looking for the word trite:

(of a remark, opinion, or idea) overused and consequently of little import; lacking originality or freshness.

"this point may now seem obvious and trite"

synonyms: banal, hackneyed, clichéd, platitudinous, vapid, commonplace, stock, conventional, stereotyped, overused, overdone, overworked, stale, worn out, timeworn, tired, hoary, hack, unimaginative, unoriginal, uninteresting, dull, uninvolving; informalold hat, corny, cornball, cheesy, boilerplate

"critics were put off by the trite dialogue"


I sometimes refer to this practice as "writing on auto-pilot." Most people, if they habitually allow themselves to write down the first expression that occurs to them in describing something, end up populating their writing with a surprisingly large number of clichés. This happens quite naturally because clichés tend to rise to the top of the expression grab-bag in any particular situation.

One problem with cliché-riddled writing is that (as you say) the writer may not have looked very deeply into the cliché to see whether it really captures the idea that he or she is trying to express. Another problem is that, even if the cliché does capture the idea appropriately, readers may receive it with insufficient consideration because it is so familiar to them as a prefab expression. A string of clichés may be perfectly apt—perhaps even profoundly so, in the right context—and yet leave many readers glassy eyed and unmoved, simply because the expressions have, through overuse, lost their original sharpness and ability to incite insight.

It takes effort (or an unusual mind) to avoid automatonically resorting to set phrases for the multitude of things that a writer (or speaker) wants to express. In the bog of everyday speech, clichés may provide familiar, secure footing for listeners who are trying to keep up with the speaker. But readers expect writers to offer a more carefully conceived expository path, and preferably one that doesn't mindlessly recycle clichés at every tenth step.


Like asking a blind man if he can see what you're saying?

We all scan at multiple levels. Literal and metaphorical. Implicit and implied. For example, if I take you literally I could say that all clichés are overused or they wouldn't be clichés. Is that what you're "actually saying"?

We all do this. When someone does it unthinkingly you can call them out by saying they "didn't think how that would sound" when they don't realize the implication.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.