0

the "not.. neither.." issue is pretty common, but I cannot seem to wrap my mind around the following particular case.

I have the sentence:

Then, in lines 6–9 of the algorithm, we add edges to E (if not existing in E
and, thus, neither in E')), such that.. bla bla.

I want to state that if the edges do not belong to the set of edges E, then they will not belong to the set of edges E' either. It is a consequence.

I suppose a correct way to say it would be:

Then, in lines 6–9 of the algorithm, we add edges to E (if not existing in E 
and, thus, not existing in E' either)), such that.. bla bla.

But I want to keep it as short as possible.

Any help is appreciated.

1 Answer 1

1

Then, in lines 6–9 of the algorithm, we add edges to E (if not existing in E and thus neither in E'), such that...

and

Then, in lines 6–9 of the algorithm, we add edges to E (if not existing in E and thus not in E' either), such that...

and

Then, in lines 6–9 of the algorithm, we add edges to E (if not existing in E and thus not in E'), such that...

are all correct. For brevity, we may use the last.

2
  • Thanx, so it seems my first attempt was correct after all :) English is not my native language and it bugged me for some reason..
    – hamster
    Commented Dec 6, 2015 at 3:04
  • My comment would be that "thus neither" is not necessary, and that "thus not in E' " is sufficient. If you are not comfortable with "thus", you can use "therefore" or the simple "so", or the simple "then".
    – Cargill
    Commented Dec 6, 2015 at 3:36

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.