2

What does the following sentence mean?

They just can’t keep their hands off the cookie jar

(or outta the cookie jar)

I came across this sentence in a movie. The context is racism and the social reasons behind black people who are discriminated, the lack of opportunities for them, the bias in the judicial system, etc.

  • 2
    By the way, the phrase itself does not have any racist overtones that I am aware of. – James Dec 2 '15 at 12:54
  • 2
    american schoolchildren used to be (maybe still are?) taught a song to help them learn the names of their classmates and learn to play together: "Who stole the cookie from the cookie jar? #1 stole the cookie from the cookie jar. Who me? Yes you! Couldn't be! Then who? #2 stole the cookie from..." – jlovegren Dec 2 '15 at 19:00
  • interesting, so this could be the origin of this phrase, thanks – Shahab Samkan Dec 4 '15 at 5:08
5

Essentially, it means not being able to resist forbidden temptations. You are told not to take any more cookies from the jar, but you can't resist. That's a metaphor for all the other temptations you are supposed to avoid.

(By the way, you can google these kinds of phrases and find lots of ready-made answers.)

3

The cookie jar is where all the goodies are, and you're only allowed to remove a cookie if Mom says so. The most familiar idiom associated with it is "caught with his hand in the cookie jar", meaning someone was helping himself to money from petty cash accounts or something of that nature and got caught.

"Cookie jar" is also sometimes used to refer to sexual relations, especially with underage individuals. You can kind of understand the implication -- the jar is to be kept closed, but someone sneaks it open.

As generally understood there are no racial overtones to "cookie jar", though certainly there may be segments of society which have assigned some sort of racial significance to it.

0

Sounds kinda racist to me. Your use of the terms racism, black people, discriminated, lack of opportunities, and bias, leads me to believe that the cookie-jar metaphor is all about a relatively common "white" attitude about Blacks in America today.

I think what is implied in the statement you highlighted is that Blacks get so frustrated with the lack of genuine opportunities to get ahead (and thus better themselves) that they kind of give up and resort to reaching into the government's "cookie jar" of welfare benefits and government programs.

These governmental benefits and programs can sometimes be just short-term solutions to complicated and deeply entrenched social problems. Systemic racism is one of those problems. Citizens (especially non-minorities) who have it "made in the shade," so to speak, look down on people who "work the system" in order to get their cookies instead of "working hard in the system" to earn their success. They're the kinds of folks who are quick to say to minorities

Hey, just do what I did. Get a good education, get an entry-level job, keep your nose to the grindstone (i.e., work really hard) and almost before you know it you'll be working your way up the ladder of success just as I did!

What those folks fail to realize is that "the system" does not work the same for minorities as it does for majorities. Minorities often find themselves in a Catch-22. A Catch-22 is a situation in which a person is frustrated by a paradoxical rule or set of circumstances that preclude any attempt to escape from them. Any move that a person can make will lead to trouble.

In this case, a minority who reaches into the cookie jar (something the non-minority will call the "easy way out") is criticized for being lazy and not wanting to better himself. On the other hand, a minority who attempts to buck the system which is rigged against him is labelled a "troublemaker." He is accused of somehow trying to subvert the system by "forcing" it to do things his way. In reality, all he is doing is attempting to create a "level playing field" for all people, himself included.

Neither behavior is without its own set of problems, and both behaviors engender no small amount of cognitive dissonance for the minority. The old saying, "Damned if you do, and damned if you don't" is perhaps an apt expression for this phenomenon.

  • This doesn't fit with the common interpretation of "cookie jar", though I agree that it's a connotation that may have been acquired. – Hot Licks Dec 2 '15 at 22:55
  • I know that racism exists, but I don't see how this phrase is racist even in the way you describe. I would be just as likely to say that a white person "has his hand in the cookie jar" if I felt he was working the system and looking for benefits due to laziness. Replace "minorities" with "the poor" in your answer and you will see that it still makes just as much sense. – James Dec 3 '15 at 14:16
  • 2
    @James & Hot Licks: Answering the OP's question took some guts on my part. Instead of being rewarded for my intestinal fortitude I'm being punished. Hardly seems fair. I answered the OP's question given the framework he himself provided. Key words in his framework: cookie jar (of course); racism; Black; them (referent: Black); bias; and they (which clearly has Black as a referent). I could be wrong, but I think your objections to my answer could very well have originated in a legitimate, though unwarranted, desire to be politically correct at the expense of not answering the OP's question. – rhetorician Dec 3 '15 at 15:32
  • Feel free to retract your downvotes if you think my "close reading" of your comments has any legitimacy. If you don't, that's OK. Either way, I won't think less of you! Don – rhetorician Dec 3 '15 at 15:37
  • 1
    @James: I'll try editing it again. If that does the trick, fine; if not, that's OK, too. Don – rhetorician Dec 4 '15 at 16:56

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.