0

Cambridge provides this example of "approximate" as a verb:

to come near in ​quality, ​amount, ​value, or ​character:

The ​painting only approximated the ​mountain ​landscape.

Similarly, Oxford provides this example:

approximate to something:

His story approximates to the facts that we already know.

My question:

Adding my own subjects (for instance "the artist" and "the author"), can I use "the story" and "the painting" as objects, while keeping the meaning exactly as is in both sentences? Here are the sentences as I want them to sound like:

I.

The ​artist only approximated the painting to the ​mountain ​landscape.

II.

The author manages to approximate his story to the facts we already know.

My suspicion is that I have changed the meaning, but I am not sure. Thank you.

0
1

The first issue is to decide whether approximates requires "to", and my best-usage detector suggests that the "to" is not very good.

So a sentence like "The author approximates the story as it is well-known in history books." sounds rather better than "The author approximates [via their writing, etc] to the story as it is well-known in history books."

I suspect "... approximates [object] to [object]" is not a common usage, irrespective of any slight meaning change.

1
  • Whether or not you think the "approximates to" sounds good, it appears to be a valid usage with a different meaning that I had never heard of either. It's in the dictionary the OP cited and the first dictionary I checked also has a line about it (but no example sentence). – Matt Samuel Nov 28 '15 at 3:43

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.