Instead, Mr Stargardt argues, the German press “hinted at what people already knew, fostering a sense of collusive semi-secrecy.” The resulting “spiral of silence” led to a sense of quasi-complicity.
This sentence is exacted from The Economist. I cannot understand the meaning of this sentence well.
I have already looked up the dictionary, so I guess that the semi-secrecy means that even though Goebbels avoid the information open but half of people know the holocaust. The quasi-complicity means that people want to do something different from a holocaust. In this case, I cannot see why this is the result of spiral of silence, as there is not hint that doing something else is the opinion of majority.
The whole paragraph is
Gradually, a new conviction spread: that this genocidal war “must never come home to Germany”. For, just as the Germans gave no mercy, so they could also expect none. Goebbels made sure that no details of the Holocaust were ever reported. Instead, Mr Stargardt argues, the German press “hinted at what people already knew, fostering a sense of collusive semi-secrecy.” The resulting “spiral of silence” led to a sense of quasi-complicity.
A link to this article is here.