3

Is there a way to imply I didn't see a person earlier using "saw" instead of "see" or "seen"?

edit: I'd go with

I never saw you

as suggested by Rathony in the comments. I would've upvoted/accepted it had he answered it rather commented. Thanks though. :)

  • 1
    Since you are being so specific that you want to use 'saw', I think you should make an attempt yourself to show us the kind of sentence you require. We can then comment. Otherwise you will simply get a lot of guesses (and probably arguments between contributors) – chasly - reinstate Monica Nov 4 '15 at 11:35
  • 1
    You can use "never" as it doesn't require a bare-infinitive after it as in "I never saw you". You need to edit your question to be more specific. – user140086 Nov 4 '15 at 11:50
  • 2
    Before Anglophones got hooked on do-support, you could have said I saw him not. But there's a new generation of speakers who could probably say that today, since they're happy to sarcastically tack not on the end of any statement to assert that it's not true. – FumbleFingers Nov 4 '15 at 12:58
0

One could say "I never saw you there" as mentioned in a comment,

or, if you are giving some explanation, "I never even saw you there". which sounds more emphatic.

| improve this answer | |
3

"I saw no trace of you" or "I saw no sign of you"

| improve this answer | |
  • Hi, just a heads-up. Your answer appeared in a "Low Quality Posts" link. – user140086 Nov 4 '15 at 12:48
  • because it's short, shall I elaborate? :) – macraf Nov 4 '15 at 12:50
  • Why not. I don't see any problem with your answer, though. – user140086 Nov 4 '15 at 13:00
2

I will go with I saw no sight of you.

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.