2

I'm trying to classify the following sentence as compound, complex or compound-complex:

These are: a book with drawings, a man holding a picture and a statue.

I think it's a complex sentence, because I think it has an independent clause (These are) and three dependent clauses (a book with drawings, a man holding a picture, a statue).

However, the regular words that start a subordinate clause aren't there, so I'm feeling like I'm missing something.

4
  • 2
    Maybe I'm missing something, but to me it looks like a simple sentence that just lists three things.
    – user139454
    Commented Oct 27, 2015 at 0:53
  • When the listed things are described using several words, doesn't that make them clauses?
    – nitzanms
    Commented Oct 27, 2015 at 8:04
  • I don't think so.
    – user139454
    Commented Oct 27, 2015 at 20:26
  • A clause requires a subject-verb relationship. Simply adding words to a description does not make a clause ("a car" is not a clause; neither is "a green car" or "an old green car" or "an incredibly valuable old green car." @user139454 is correct--this is a simple sentence that lists three things. More below.
    – user66965
    Commented Nov 12, 2015 at 17:01

1 Answer 1

0

This is a complex sentence. There are 3 kinds of sentences: simple ones; compound ones, which have more than one independent clause; and complex ones, which include an independent clause and one or more dependent clauses. See more at ENGL 1001.

This sentence contains the dependent clause "holding a picture," so it's complex.

9
  • Isn't "a man holding a picture" a clause? It has a subject (a man) and a predicate (holding a book).
    – nitzanms
    Commented Oct 31, 2015 at 12:09
  • Argh, you're right. Fixed.
    – Maverick
    Commented Nov 2, 2015 at 15:07
  • So it's enough to have a dependent clause, and it doesn't matter if the words that usually start a dependent clause are there?
    – nitzanms
    Commented Nov 5, 2015 at 14:21
  • 1
    Right. ENGL 1001 has its definition, and I'd go with that, but it makes sense: a sentence doesn't change because you omit some understood words. "The reason I gave" is a noun with a modifying relative clause, even if we left out "that" ("The reason that I gave").
    – Maverick
    Commented Nov 6, 2015 at 16:16
  • @nitzanms "holding a picture" is not a predicate, because "holding" does not function as a verb. It functions as an adjective (it describes which man is being referred to--the one "holding the book"). The "man holding a picture" is a participial phrase, not a clause.
    – user66965
    Commented Nov 9, 2015 at 21:09

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.