0

I don't want to spend too much money on phones. May I say

I am cheap with phones

or

I am cheap about phones

I have come across a sentence that says

I am cheap for certain things

Does that mean I can say

I am cheap for phones

or can I say

I am cheap on phones

7
  • Using cheap in this sense is not idiomatic in my estimation. There are a large number of expressions you could use from being economical to being mean or tight-fisted, but cheap is not normally used in that way.
    – WS2
    Commented Oct 20, 2015 at 22:53
  • @WS2 In the United States it certainly is used in this sense. Commented Oct 20, 2015 at 22:55
  • Though a little wordier, it's more idiomatic and natural-sounding to say, for example "I am cheap when it comes to my phone". Or "When it comes to phones, I'm cheap!" Or "I'm a cheapskate when it comes to paying for phone service." Commented Oct 20, 2015 at 23:10
  • @MattSamuel Sorry, I hadn't realised that. Cheap is used in many senses, but that's a new one on me.
    – WS2
    Commented Oct 20, 2015 at 23:10
  • 1
    @KristinaLopez The OP seems to have thrown up one of those occasional Anglo/American howlers - like randy (an innocent boy's name in America, but having an insatiable sexual desire in Britain). Being cheap is not something any self-respecting British person would want to be accused of, let alone admit to.
    – WS2
    Commented Oct 20, 2015 at 23:15

1 Answer 1

1

I would say, "I'm cheap when it comes to phones." "I'm cheap on phones" also could be used, but "I'm cheap for phones" seems ungrammatical.

2
  • I don't think that would work in British English. Commented Oct 20, 2015 at 22:59
  • Why don't you think it would work in British English, Mr Chasly?
    – Tom Lee
    Commented Oct 22, 2015 at 2:05

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.