0

I don't want to spend too much money on phones. May I say

I am cheap with phones

or

I am cheap about phones

I have come across a sentence that says

I am cheap for certain things

Does that mean I can say

I am cheap for phones

or can I say

I am cheap on phones

  • Using cheap in this sense is not idiomatic in my estimation. There are a large number of expressions you could use from being economical to being mean or tight-fisted, but cheap is not normally used in that way. – WS2 Oct 20 '15 at 22:53
  • @WS2 In the United States it certainly is used in this sense. – Matt Samuel Oct 20 '15 at 22:55
  • Though a little wordier, it's more idiomatic and natural-sounding to say, for example "I am cheap when it comes to my phone". Or "When it comes to phones, I'm cheap!" Or "I'm a cheapskate when it comes to paying for phone service." – Kristina Lopez Oct 20 '15 at 23:10
  • @MattSamuel Sorry, I hadn't realised that. Cheap is used in many senses, but that's a new one on me. – WS2 Oct 20 '15 at 23:10
  • 1
    @KristinaLopez The OP seems to have thrown up one of those occasional Anglo/American howlers - like randy (an innocent boy's name in America, but having an insatiable sexual desire in Britain). Being cheap is not something any self-respecting British person would want to be accused of, let alone admit to. – WS2 Oct 20 '15 at 23:15
1

I would say, "I'm cheap when it comes to phones." "I'm cheap on phones" also could be used, but "I'm cheap for phones" seems ungrammatical.

  • I don't think that would work in British English. – chasly from UK Oct 20 '15 at 22:59
  • Why don't you think it would work in British English, Mr Chasly? – Tom Lee Oct 22 '15 at 2:05

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.