I know that there are two ways to pronounce the th sound. Like in the word 'then' and 'thing'. But in a lot of cases I hear it pronounced as a d sound, especially in fast speech or if it comes after the s consonant, for example. As in across the floor or as they went. In cases like these it doesn't sound to me as the voiced form of the th. Am I right or am I deaf?

  • 3
    You are not deaf! They do sound like dat.
    – user140086
    Commented Oct 9, 2015 at 9:34
  • 1
    It depends on the word you are using after "as". for eg." as this sunset turns to morning" , "this"(th sound) will always sound the same whether or not you have an "as" before it.likewise "they" will sound more like "dey"(d sound) even when it does not have an "as" before it. Commented Oct 9, 2015 at 9:44
  • 2
    "Dee do dough, don't dee?" (meaning "They do though, don't they?") is a catchphrase of the Liverpool "comedian" Stan Boardman. The 'd' substitution is common in the 'Scouse' regional accent (and in many others).
    – JHCL
    Commented Oct 9, 2015 at 9:46
  • 1
    If you wish to poorly pronounce your words, you certainly may pronounce "th" as "d". It is a good way to indicate that you are poorly educated and don't care how you are perceived.
    – Hot Licks
    Commented Oct 9, 2015 at 11:15
  • 3
    In General American English, when preceded by s or z sounds, these are still th (voiced or unvoiced alveolar fricatives). But they are more likely to be elided (lost, unspoken altogether) than converted to d. In some regional dialects (older people in New York, Chicago, AAVE), 'th' is often changed to 'd'. But that is not the standard General American pronunciation.
    – Mitch
    Commented Oct 9, 2015 at 14:10

3 Answers 3


There are several varieties of English which use a [d] to represent the voiced th sound and a [t] to represent the voiceless one, as well as several others which use [v] and [f] respectively instead.

However, I think the Original Poster is asking about variation in the pronunciation of [ð] in accents such as British RP, or General American, where a canonical /ð/ is thought of as being a voiced dental fricative.

If you ask speakers of such types of English what sound they use at the beginning of the word the, they would make a clearly articulated [ð]. This sound has two parts to it. The first is voicing caused by the vibration of the vocal chords. This is what gives the sound its pitch. The second aspect is the audible friction caused by turbulence in the air as it is forced over the surface of the tongue and out through the stricture formed by the tongue resting against the back of the upper incisors.

The description of this sound is a voiced dental fricative. The term voiced reflects the vocal fold vibration, the term dental reflects the place of articulation and the involvement of the front teeth and the term fricative indicates the type of consonant and the fact that it uses turbulence caused by air being forced through a narrow aperture. This involves an increase in the air pressure in the mouth behind the stricture.

This, however, is just how we think about this sound in an idealised kind of way. In real life the realisation of this phoneme is very often not actually a fricative at all. It is actually very often realised as an approximant. What this means is that the tongue still makes contact with the teeth but there is no friction involved. The air pressure in the mouth does not increase and there is no audible friction caused by air being forced out of a narrow stricture at high pressure.

The reason that the Original Poster might perceive the /ð/ in the string as they went as a [d] is because there's very likely to be a complete absence of frication - which will make the sound quite different to our idealised canonical version of /ð/.

It is probably also worth mentioning that this phoneme is subject to many types of assimilatory processes as well as, in the case of consonant clusters, complete elision (in other words not being pronounced at all).

So, for example in the sequence in the, the th sound will often be realised as a voiced dental nasal, in other words as an [n] made on the back of the front teeth instead of on the alveolar ridge. So the th sound there will have adopted the manner of the consonant from the preceding /n/. This type of assimilation happens in many other sequences. So in fast speech the th sound in is there any ... will often transorm into a /z/.

The Original Poster isn't deaf! Far from it, they have razor-sharp ears.

  • Thank you very much, your answer was quite professional and helpful. It was the best so far, and I really appreciate your efforts and that of the others, too. Thank you every one, you helped me a lot. Commented Oct 10, 2015 at 6:07
  • 2
    The physical side of language is my favorite part. Anyone who has tried to learn a language with phonemes absent in their mother tongue knows the gymnastics it takes to generate the approximate sound. It is so wonderful when someone can tell us "Put your tongue right behind your teeth. Now engage your voice and you will feel a little vibration as your breath comes through...Okay! That's the sound."
    – Lynnjamin
    Commented Mar 2, 2016 at 14:03
  • Your last sentence seems at odds with the rest of your answer. The OP asks if /ð/ becomes a stop in a given context, but you only mention nasals and approximants, very much in the other direction from stops. In some, non-standard varieties /ð/ does become a stop even outside the OPs context, but in most varieties it is lenited in the OPs context.
    – Mitch
    Commented Mar 14, 2016 at 15:27
  • @Mitch Both stops and approximants involve the lack of frication. So the absence of frication in conjunction with a roughly dental place of articulation will account for the perception of [d], because we have no other dental approximants in English. In contrast, some native speakers will swear blind that they always produce and always here the frication - even when it isn't there. Hence the OP's listening skills are very good. Commented Mar 14, 2016 at 15:33
  • Yes, you're right. Sorry. I deleted my comment.
    – Greg Lee
    Commented Mar 17, 2018 at 7:38

This is known as th-stopping, which is a feature of some accents of English. For instance Wikipedia mentions then and den sounding the same in African American Vernacular English.


(Note: the "th" in "the" has the IPA symbol /ð/.)

It's a dialectual as well as accent variation.

Funny enough, even with me being a native speaker I couldn't distinguish /ð/ and /d/ until I was 12 because I wasn't simply told what the difference was until then.

In slang chat you can still see people substitute "d" for the /ð/ sound instead of "th", for example:


(Warning, swearing)

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.