up vote 1 down vote favorite

Here's the context in question, please read on:

"The final proof is in the listening and John knows this. This knowledge makes him a designer in constant dynamic relationship with what he makes, rather than an applicator of proven scientific knowledge."

Can I use "Applicator of knowledge" to describe a person? How does it sound to native speakers? If it does not sound right, how else may I write the same sentence?

Thanks a lot, Maryam

share|improve this question
  • 1
    I would go with: …rather than someone who applies proven scientific knowledge. – Graham Nicol Oct 7 '15 at 18:44
  • Maybe an applier of proven scientific knowledge – GEdgar Oct 7 '15 at 21:18
  • 1
    Practitioner? – JHCL Oct 7 '15 at 21:20
  • 2
    The word applicator, to me, suggests something one might use e.g. a spray, or plastic widget for applying gel to a skin rash, or inflamed haemorrhoids. . – WS2 Oct 7 '15 at 22:21
  • It's syntactically correct, and semantically correct in an awkward sense, but not particularly idiomatic. While it is correct that the application of scientific knowledge is something that people do, the term "applicator" is usually reserved for a person or device which, eg, paints stuff onto something. A more appropriate term is "applier" (though that doesn't read real great either, so it's likely best to reword things a bit). – Hot Licks Oct 7 '15 at 22:58
up vote 1 down vote

The answer is both technically no and aesthetically no. Not taking into account the fact that 'applicator' refers nearly exclusively to a device rather than a person, the word itself in the given context is too awkward and clunky anyway. I suggest using another word in its place or reconstructing the clause in question as a whole. If the latter option is your preference (which might produce a better overall sentence), you could say something like the following: "... rather than a logician concerned only with the rigid knowledge of what is. For John, the goal always lies in what could be."

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.