0

Can you explain why there is no need for the auxiliary verb to be before related in the following sentence:

Do you have any information related to the book?

What kind of grammar rules are applied in situations like this?

|improve this question
  • 1
    Participles (both present and past) have been employed as adjectives (both before and after the nouns they modify) as long as the language has been written down. – StoneyB on hiatus Oct 2 '15 at 19:45
3

WHIZ is the (sort of slangy) name of the rule that optionally deletes "which is" after "information" in your example. "Related to the book" is the remnant of the original relative clause "which is related to the book" modifying "information".

And that's what happened to the auxiliary verb "is" before "related".

|improve this answer
  • 1
    Could you perhaps include a link to a reference for this rule? – Holly Oct 2 '15 at 22:49
  • 1
    Whiz-Deletion. – John Lawler Oct 2 '15 at 23:41

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.