1

What were they doing differently that had led to this dramatic improvement?

I saw a sentence having the same structure as the one above. But I am not sure that this sentence is grammatically correct. I would like to know your opinions.


The "that" in the sentence seems a relative pronoun, but where is the antecedent? When I speculate what it says, the antecedent could be the "what". Is it possible?

  • 1
    Might help if you point out the specific bit you feel is wonky. – Huey Sep 26 '15 at 4:35
  • At face value, this sentence looks fine. It could definitely use some more context though. – Sculper Sep 26 '15 at 4:43
  • 1
    You speculate correctly. "That" refers to thing being asked about with "what.' – deadrat Sep 26 '15 at 6:04
  • The Wh-clause -- more specifically, its answer -- is the antecedent of that (or which), the subject of had led. The answer itself is indefinite, and amounts to a pro-verb do what. Clearly it's not a noun but an action. The Wh-clause itself is an NP, though, so it can take a relative clause. – John Lawler Sep 26 '15 at 15:25
  • The tenses are reversed. s/b "What had they been doing that led to this dramatic improvement? – Brian Hitchcock Sep 27 '15 at 7:28
2

Yes, that_ is the antecedent of the relative clause, which is shifted by "heavy clause extraposition".

  • Thank you. So then, you could say "What that surprised you did they do?" – 243 Sep 26 '15 at 16:49
  • 1
    You could say it, but to me What did they do that surprised you would be more natural. – Colin Fine Sep 27 '15 at 18:08

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.