Why the disparity? And why use 'No.'? Is it from the French?
And the hash or pound sign seems a weird choice too, is there a history or any reason involved?
No. comes from the abbreviation of "numero", ablative case of the Latin "numerus"
# was used in America for an interesting reason:
In the United States, the symbol is traditionally called the pound sign or the number sign. The pound name derives from a series of abbreviations for pound, the unit of weight. At first "lb." was used; however, printers later designed a font containing a special symbol of an "lb" with a line through the verticals so that the lowercase letter "l" would not be mistaken for the numeral/digit "1". Unicode character U+2114 (℔) is called the "L B bar symbol", and it is a cursive development of this symbol. Ultimately, the symbol was reduced for clarity as an overlay of two horizontal strokes "=" across two forward-slash-like strokes "//"1
# in America ultimately became used for numbering everything, not just in weight, but in any quantity.
The reason the # wasn't used as a numbering sign in England was because the pound in England was denoted by the (£) sign, so
# wasn't used to avoid confusion.
1 The above was taken from here
I consider this etymology to be more correct for
No., since No. is not an acronym but an abbreviation:
ORIGIN: from Latin numero, ablative of numerus ‘number.’ ]
I couldn't find anything on the # symbol yet, I guess that wikipedia article is the only source. I'll make sure to edit in case I find something else.
Thank you for your interest in this question.
Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).
Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?