Euphemism - noun

  1. the substitution of a mild, indirect, or vague expression for one thought to be offensive, harsh, or blunt.
  2. the expression so substituted: “To pass away” is a euphemism for “to die.”.

Is this correct? "To pass away" is thought to be offensive, while "to die" is mild?

  • 5
    It's correct, you just have it backwards. "To pass away" is less blunt than "to die". – z7sg Ѫ Aug 21 '15 at 17:04
  • 5
    Tom, you might like to look at this page ,which I think addresses your question. – Margana Aug 21 '15 at 17:04
  • @Margana the link explain "“Substitute…for…”—first replaces second; ok, but here it says "substitution of...for...", the substitution of is still the first replaces the second? Sounds really confusing for me... I understand that euphemism is to use a mild term, instead of a blunt one, but the dictionary definition looks like to say the oposite. – Tom Brito Aug 21 '15 at 20:07
  • @Margana the answer from user39813 there is the best for me :) – Tom Brito Aug 21 '15 at 20:31
  • 2
    @Tom: Ok. I think what's bothering you is the difference between the usage for a verb and that for a noun. As you say in your comment, both examples give "for", so they agree on that. The reason one uses "of" and not the other is that in: "To subsititue A for B", "substitute" is a verb. In "the substitution of A for B", "substitution" is a noun, which needs to be connected to its object with "of". So, "Substitute A for B" = "The substitution of A for B". Is this helpful? – Margana Aug 21 '15 at 20:36

You have it mixed up. "To die" is considered blunt, while "To pass way" is considered a milder way of putting it (euphemism).

|improve this answer|||||

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.