This question already has an answer here:

"dick" has developed a lot of meanings. Pons.eu lists five different meanings. The semantic development of most of them can be understood, but "dick all/dick" for nothing is a bit mysterious (AmE, slang). Does anybody know more about this American slang use?

  • He doesn't know dick all.

  • He doesn't know dick about us. Tomy Clancy, USA, The Teeth of the Tiger.

marked as duplicate by TimLymington, tchrist, choster, Chenmunka, Dan Bron Aug 15 '15 at 16:11

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

  • Anything specific you'd like to know about it? – Dan Bron Aug 12 '15 at 15:27
  • Ngram shows that b****r all was the term during the nineteen-forties and fifties; f**k all in the swinging sixties; and dick all in the mean and solipsistic eighties and nineties. – Hugh Aug 12 '15 at 15:32
  • This is an example of what's called a Squatitive, like He knows/doesn't know squat/(jack)shit/dick about it. They are involved with negatives; some of them are negative already, and others need external negatives. The link shows a number of puzzles. – John Lawler Aug 12 '15 at 18:12
  • @JohnLawler Interesting. – rogermue Aug 12 '15 at 19:28
  • 1
    I know damn all about it. – Tonepoet Aug 12 '15 at 21:49

An earlier, similar expression is "doesn't know shit". Because excrement is widely considered to be the most undesirable of possessions, "shit" came to be used among the less refined as a synonym for "nothing of value", and thence "nothing".

From there, the word "dick", which was already an obscene version of "penis", was substituted for "shit". This phenomenon is common in modern swearing, where one obscene term in a phrase is frequently substituted with some other obscenity without any change in meaning. Such substitutions help keep these obscene phrases sounding fresh and "hip".

After that, "dick all" probably resulted from a combination of the Americanism "dick" with the Britishism "bugger all". Again, this was intended to keep things sounding surprising and exciting.


The phrase in question is just a cacophemism for "anything" (or "nothing," depending on whether the expression is framed affirmatively or negatively). As such, the word placed before "all" in the phrase "[cacophemism] all" can be any of an array of offensive words that grab the hearer's attention (until they become tedious and commonplace) and delight ten-year-old boys.

Allan Walker, Lexical Evidence from Folk Epigraphy in Western North America: A Glossarial Study of the Low Element in the English Vocabulary (1935) [combined snippets] explains this linguistic phenomenon as follows:

Just as taboo has its reverse in inverted taboo, so euphemism has its reverse in cacophemism or dysphemism. This is the rhetorical device of speaking ill of a thing, as in calling one's clothes duds, one's horse a nag, or any woman a bitch. The phrase to kick the bucket is a taboo-substitute for "to die" and yet at the same time it is a cacophemism.

Perhaps more specifically relevant to the OP's question is John Brophy & Eric Partridge, ed., Songs and Slang of the British Soldier, third edition (1931):

So common indeed was [fuck] in its adjectival form that after a short time the ear refused to acknowledge it and took in only the noun to which it was attached. Dean Inge recently remarked of bloody as used by working men that it means nothing, it is simply a warning that a noun is coming. So with the soldier's use of this sexual word. From being an intensive to express strong emotion it became a merely conventional excrescence. By adding -ing and -ingwell, an adjective and an adverb were formed and thrown into every sentence. It became so common that an effective way for the soldier to express emotion was to omit this word. Thus, if a sergeant said 'Get your ---ing rifles!' it was understood as a matter of routine. But if he said 'Get your rifles!' there was an immediate implication of emergency and danger.

It follows that there is no etymological explanation for the use of dick in the offensive-word slot of the cacophemism "dick all"; it's simply swapped in to provide the necessary offensive word.

  • Bloody is only used to mark that a noun follows? Someone hasn't bloody figured out yet that bloody can bloody well mark that a bloody lot of other bloody different word classes bloody follow, Mr Dean bloody Inge! ;-) – Janus Bahs Jacquet Aug 12 '15 at 23:42
  • @JanusBahsJacquet: Bloody well right. – Sven Yargs Aug 12 '15 at 23:50

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.