Sindbad was a rich and a famous sailor.
Sindbad was a rich and famous sailor.
Which of these are correct?
What is the general rule for using articles before a noun with two adjectives?
The second one is correct. The first one makes it sound as if he is a 'rich' (not a noun) and a 'sailor,' who is famous for being a sailor.
I can't think of a situation where you would use the indefinite article (a/an) twice in a single noun phrase. In most cases, you wouldn't use the definite article twice either to describe the same thing.
*The green and the blue marbles
clearly means two separate groups of marbles.
The exception, you can use multiple (definite) articles with superlatives, but it sounds stilted and kinda anachronistic.
Isaac Newton was the greatest and the luckiest of the mortals.
(From the New York Public Library: http://web-static.nypl.org/exhibitions/newton/introduction.html)
These adjectives use the definite article because you must be referring to a definite noun when using them. You can't say
a greatest mortal. I would argue that the "the" can be analyzed as a necessary part of the superlative, at least in writing.
The first construction is rare, and likely to be used only as part of a poetic or literary style.
In normal everyday speech and writing, use the second example.
Thank you for your interest in this question.
Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).
Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?