41

Is there a word (or words) for a person who uses all resources to the maximum; for example, a person who keeps on using pencils even if they are very small?

|improve this question
  • 2
    perhaps "efficient". Be sure to PLUS and TICK useful answers, new user. – Fattie Aug 10 '15 at 12:33
  • 2
    possible duplicate of Finding a better way to say "put to good use" – Edwin Ashworth Aug 10 '15 at 15:10
  • 3
    Unwasteful comes to mind for the pencil example. – MonkeyZeus Aug 10 '15 at 16:56
  • 5
    In my corner of the universe, we call that a "project manager." – cobaltduck Aug 10 '15 at 17:51
  • 4
    I've no idea why, but seeing only the title of this question in the sidebar, the impression I got was a 'tragedy of the commons' situation, that it definitely concerned someone using others' resources to the maximum. Boy, was I surprised. – Vandermonde Aug 12 '15 at 3:44

16 Answers 16

57

Frugal

characterized by or reflecting economy in the use of resources ~ Dictionary.com

By being frugal, he's able to make his box of pencils last a very long time.

Economical

avoiding waste or extravagance; thrifty: ~ Dictionary.com

He is economical by nature. He can make a box of pencils last a year.

|improve this answer
  • 3
    I think Frugal tends to mean someone who doesn't use the resource in order to make it last longer - usually to save money. Thrifty is a better word for using the resource to best advantage, but there's not that much between them TBH. – gbjbaanb Aug 10 '15 at 15:27
  • 3
    @gbjbaanb, Well, we don't know from the question why the person is motivated to maximize use of resources. Like you pointed out, if he's trying to save money by making the resource last longer, he's frugal. If he just doesn't want to be wasteful, maybe he's efficient. Or maybe he has a psychological disorder. We just don't know. But "frugal" seems to fit the question well IMHO. – Michael_B Aug 10 '15 at 17:04
  • is there any differnce in the two words you propose? – Ooker Aug 11 '15 at 6:38
  • 1
    @Ooker I think frugal has a more intense connotation, which can be either positive or negative depending on whether you view it as a desirable trait or as "too much". – Matthew Read Aug 12 '15 at 20:28
37

thrifty

ˈθrɪfti
adjective
1. using money and other resources carefully and not wastefully.
he had been brought up to be thrifty and careful

(oxforddictionaries.com)

|improve this answer
23

efficient

I have one friend who's incredibly efficient. He extracts full value from everything; nothing goes to waste in his life. He won't even trash a pencil until it's too small to hold.

|improve this answer
  • 2
    I'm not sure this totally fits. I would describe using a bare nub of a pencil over grabbing another more usable one to be inefficient. You'd have to qualify it further such as being efficient with respect to expenditure or consumption. – Matthew Read Aug 12 '15 at 20:30
  • @MatthewRead, he would be extracting full value from the pencil and not let any of it go to waste. Unless that costs him time or energy that he would otherwise save by grabbing another more usable pencil (which would have to be a pretty extreme scenario), I would say he's being efficient. – Michael_B Aug 12 '15 at 20:40
18

I proffer, sparing:

  1. avoiding waste (vocab.com)

  2. not using or giving a lot of something (MW)

    • “a sparing father and a spending son”
    • “sparing in their use of pencils”
|improve this answer
15

"Thrify", "frugal", and even "economical", while good answers to this question, unfortunately have come to carry negative connotations, in that they're often seen as euphemisms for "cheap", "stingy", or "miserly".

"Provident" is another antonym of "wasteful". It is defined by Merriam-Webster as "making provision for the future : prudent" and as "frugal, saving". It is not as commonly used as most of its synonyms, and perhaps for that very reason, does not bear the same negative connotations.

(Unless, of course, the questioner actually wants negative connotations, in which case I'd recommend "miserly".)

|improve this answer
  • 1
    Joined this community just to upvote this answer. After reading the question, I really looked forward to an answer with positive connotation. "Provident" is the most fitting positive word, IMO. – kdbanman Aug 12 '15 at 20:50
  • The question places no importance on "negativity" or the lack of it, so I see no benefit to making such a big deal out of it. Nevermind that I completely disagree and commonly see all of these supposedly negatively connoted words in neutral and positive contexts as well. This answer would do better to simply offer provident as an obscure option and leave it at that. – talrnu Aug 13 '15 at 16:56
7

How about resourceful? As in "mark usually has all things electronic, he's quite resourceful that way."

|improve this answer
  • 3
    A resourceful person finds solutions, they do not use resources to the full as required by the question. – Chenmunka Aug 10 '15 at 17:49
  • 2
    @Chenmunka To put it another way, resourceful people identify resources in their environment that others might not recognize as resources at all. They then use those resources to find a solution to the problem at hand, where others would fail. But yes, it's not a good fit for the question. – Doug Warren Aug 10 '15 at 17:52
  • in los santos, a resourceful person is the one who steals cars. – Ejaz Aug 12 '15 at 4:13
4

In the case of pencils, the is a device called a "miser" that allows one to use a pencil even when it is very small

|improve this answer
  • "Miser" has too negative a connotation. I've seen students use the pencil right to the end, and some who comment when they observe me tossing one too soon just because the eraser is worn down. They think me wasteful. – JoeTaxpayer Aug 10 '15 at 18:20
  • I just looked these up on America's favorite ecommerce site, where they're also called "pencil extenders" or "pencil lengtheners". – Doug Warren Aug 10 '15 at 19:51
  • 2
    this is not an answer to the question – amphibient Aug 11 '15 at 18:49
  • @amphibient I presume the implication was that "miser" describes the person too. – Martin Smith Aug 11 '15 at 22:57
3

I would call that person an optimizer.

|improve this answer
  • I like it, it ispirwd me to think of optimitron – Arjang Aug 13 '15 at 0:30
2

Industrious indicates someone maximizes use of available resources. Thrifty indicates minimizes use of resources.

|improve this answer
  • 1
    Google defines thrifty as: (of a person or their behavior) using money and other resources carefully and not wastefully. So not a minimization of resources but just not wasteful. – Matthew Aug 10 '15 at 19:10
  • 1
    I consider industrious to mean more like productive than resource maximizing. Maximizing resources seems like it would would be a good achieve industriousness though. – Dan Aug 10 '15 at 20:50
1

Have you considered the word "exploiter" as a synonym for a person who uses resources to the maximum? Exploiter does have a negative connotation, certainly. See the verb-form definitions here: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/exploiter. Also, the word "uses" is open to various interpretations. "Uses" can mean "consumes" or "exploits", perhaps, or am I far from the intended meaning of the question?

|improve this answer
  • For what little it's worth, I'm with you! Although the pencil example might lead to some of the other answers given so far (but then again, imagine what such a person would expect from their graphite mines and miners), all other aspects of the question, including the question itself as stated in the question header, led me immediately to your good answer. – Papa Poule Aug 13 '15 at 16:06
0

Also Economizer

Definition: a frugal person who limits spending and avoids waste, a person who reduces expenditure.

|improve this answer
0

Exhaustive

Tending to use or drain (exhaust) all resources.

|improve this answer
0

If you are looking for a word with a negative connotation to describe this person you can try stingy or penurious, but obviously these are most often associated with being tight with funds.

Might still work though if you're describing this person's resourcefulness in a negative way.

|improve this answer
0

Stubgrinder is an apropos eponym in this particular case.

|improve this answer
0

Most terms I know for this refer to the economic/monetary context of the behavior, essentially equating it with "not spending": frugal, economical, thrifty, penny-pinching/er, tightwad, skinflint, cheapskate, pinchfist, cheese-paring/er1. I suppose that there may people who maximize their resource utilization for reasons other than to save money. Some possible such reasons, all unconcerned with saving money: 1. concern over depletion of the world's natural resources (ecology-minded/aware, resource-preserving); 2. a personal ethical stance towards consumption ("I shall drain the cup to the dregs"); 3. a form of obsessiveness (retentive); 4. a primary repugnance (or phobia) towards waste (waste-averse/phobic).

1 All the italicized terms in this list are generally considered both colloquial and derogatory.

|improve this answer
0

the ultimate should be the utilizer or utilizitron.

e.g.: He is a utilizator, he utilizes the pen to its last drop.

|improve this answer
  • This does not provide an answer to the question. To critique or request clarification from an author, leave a comment below their post. – Dog Lover Aug 13 '15 at 1:35
  • @DogLover : Why is this not an answer to the question? Since somebody is utilizing the hell out of things then "the utilizer" or "utilizator" should be acceptable. – Arjang Aug 13 '15 at 8:31
  • 1
    Utilize means simply to use effectively, it doesn't imply the degree of utilization. The fact that your example must mention "to its last drop" to specify the degree of utilization is clear evidence of this. As for utilizitron... I do believe you made that word up. But it'd be a cool name for a robot. – talrnu Aug 13 '15 at 17:01

protected by tchrist♦ Aug 13 '15 at 11:39

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.