Is there a single word for witches and wizards both, regardless of gender?

Edit 1: Is there a single word for the category of people who do magic (like witches, wizards, warlocks, sorcerers, etc.)?

Edit 2: The usage example comes from a story I made up for my niece. She wanted to know why I was designating male cats who do magic as witches alongside the female cats. Shouldn't they be called wizards, she asked. I then wondered whether there's one word that encompasses everyone who does magic.

  • 1
    Those both work for both genders.
    – tchrist
    Aug 7, 2015 at 12:23
  • 5
    This is all madey-uppy stuff, so you are welcome to make up anything you please. I can cite innumerable works of fiction in which both occur in either gender.
    – tchrist
    Aug 7, 2015 at 12:36
  • 3
    @Tragicomic I did not understand what you were asking for. The general term for a user of magic is of course a magic-user or a magician, the former being the term using in D&D. But because these are complete fabulations, you can make up anything you want, and it will vary between mythologies. In the real world, such would-be occult practitioners are all charlatans, although not all charlatans claim to have magical powers.
    – tchrist
    Aug 7, 2015 at 12:58
  • 1
    @tchrist: :-) For some reason, the words magician and conjurer bring to mind people on stage performing illusions, rather than someone who is (or is thought to be) a witch or a wizard.
    – Tragicomic
    Aug 7, 2015 at 13:02
  • 2
    I think the fact that some things don't really exist outside our imagination doesn't mean the words we have for them aren't real. For example, I'm pretty certain Martians and Venusians don't really exist, but we have very real words for them. And Martians and Venusians both could be categorized as aliens. Similarly the words "poltergeist" and "wraith" are real, and both poltergeists and wraiths can be categorized as ghosts. I wonder if there is a similar recognized category for witches and wizards.
    – Tragicomic
    Aug 8, 2015 at 11:51

5 Answers 5


I would suggest using either Mage or Magus (plural: Mages and Magi respectively). Both of them convey a gender-neutral magic-user, without giving off a sense of being a mere illusionist.

However, the term "mage" has fallen out of use, with wizard and witch being the standard terms for any magic user. The term "mage" is gender neutral.

I'd consider Mage the more neutral option of the two, as Magus has a slight hint of masculinity from Latin.

  • I was just wondering if a feminine form "maga" was ever used in Latin to refer to a female mage... I haven't found out yet. BTW the usual pronunciations of "magus" and "magi" in English are "MAY-guss" and "MAY-jye" respectively. I thought I'd mention it because it's a little tricky, like "locus" and "loci."
    – herisson
    Aug 9, 2015 at 20:01
  • 1
    Witch is from Old English and wizard from Late Middle English, but mage is not that old. It is, however, “archaic” per the OED. Mage was merely an Early Modern English anglicization of the Latin magus; the OED gives only a single Late Middle English citation for magis. It was kept hobbling along by the nineteenth century Romantic poets, a tradition carried into the early twentieth century by certain writers of genre fiction who wished to impart an archaizing flavor to their tales. It was later popularized by Gary Gygax, whence it disseminated to paper-and-pencil FRPG gamers.
    – tchrist
    Aug 9, 2015 at 20:33
  • +1 Thanks for your answer. And welcome to ELU Stack Exchange.
    – Tragicomic
    Aug 10, 2015 at 8:35

Your edit includes what would have been my first choice (sorcerer) (but then again sorceress does exist, as mentioned elsewhere).

With all that in mind, I'll suggest conjurer/or:

"a person who conjures  spirits or practices magic; magician"

(Dictionary reference)

  • +1 I believe you're right. However, to my mind, "conjurer" brings to mind an image of a man standing on stage cruelly pulling a rabbit out of a hat. So does "magician," for some reason. Not someone who is (or is thought to be) a "witch" or a "wizard." :-(.
    – Tragicomic
    Aug 7, 2015 at 13:05
  • @Tragicomic - You need to keep in mind that none of this (except a stage magician's prestidigitation) is real. Therefore it's hard to come up with definitions that are well-defined with crisp borders.
    – Hot Licks
    Aug 7, 2015 at 13:19

The best word for what you're looking for in my opinion is mage, because it has the same root word as magic, it's gender neutral, and it just means magic-user and nothing else. But you're not going to get much mileage out of the word mage outside of a fantasy context.

  • Plural would be mages/magi. And yes its a bit too arcane for common talk.
    – user568109
    Aug 8, 2015 at 1:15
  • +1 Thank you. I like mage, which simply means "magician" as you say, without the connotation of an illusionist on stage (which I feel the words "magician" and "conjurer" carry).
    – Tragicomic
    Aug 9, 2015 at 0:02

I would recommend "practitioner". If you want to be specific, you can use the two-word "magical practitioner".

someone who regularly does a particular activity

Even without "magical", it has a usage within certain literary circles. In the popular novel series The Dresden Files, persons who use magic, regardless of the type, are referred to as "practitioners":

Practitioner is a generic term for an individual who can use magic. The word signifies only the presence of magical talent; it has no connotations regarding the individual's power or skill. There are a number of other terms, however, which do have such connotations.

Obviously, this is used within a specific literary world in this case, but the terminology appears even in other articles:

"Magician (paranormal)"

A magician is a practitioner of magic who attains objectives or acquires knowledge using supernatural means.

The Smart Witch: Introduction to Magic:

One thing magical practitioners have in common throughout history and around the world today is curiosity – the quest for knowledge. We are the original inquiring minds who want to know. There is a reason that so many of the first books printed were grimoires – books of magic – on the whole, magical practitioners are great readers.

The major issue as I see it is that the terminology varies depending on the world you're in.

In Harry Potter, for example, witch is the feminine version of wizard... the type of magic they do is pretty much identical.

In other worlds, everyone who practices "wizardry", regardless of gender is a "wizard" and the practice of witchcraft is very different, and everyone who practices it is called a "witch", again, regardless of gender, though most seem to be female. Similarly, a "magician" could be something different entirely.

I believe that "practitioner" or "magical practitioner" is a word that holds none of the connotations of the individual words have.

  • 2
    If I saw the word practitioner used without any qualifiers, I would immediately assume it meant a doctor—a medical practitioner. Aug 7, 2015 at 20:00
  • @JanusBahsJacquet even if it was in a paper about magical people? Presumably there's going to be some context... and that's also why I recommended the two-word option.
    – Catija
    Aug 7, 2015 at 20:01
  • 2
    I’ve never seen or heard practitioner used to refer to, erm, non-Muggles, so I think I’d just be a bit nonplussed if I saw it used, unqualified, in a paper about magical people—I’d first wonder if I’d missed some reference to the medical profession, and then probably suss it out after a batted eyelid or two. Magical practitioner would probably strike me at the first read as a slightly unusual phrasing, but I would at least know immediately what was meant and would probably be used to it by the second reading. Aug 7, 2015 at 20:04
  • @JanusBahsJacquet I don't understand what you want me to say... I've shown that the word is used in magical situations and it seems that your personal dislike is all you're expressing. If you dislike it, then don't vote it up.
    – Catija
    Aug 7, 2015 at 20:05
  • +1 Thanks for your answer. I do believe I have heard the term "practitioners of magic" used.
    – Tragicomic
    Aug 8, 2015 at 23:59

"Witch" is not necessarily the cognate of "wizard" in any way. A wizard is someone who has developed some form of wisdom (wiz-dom). It comes from Olde English, as the root is "wis", meaning wise. The conversion of that into a personal noun by adding suffix -ard came later as noted below. Its use even then reflected at first and primarily the quality of wisdom as attributed to a person. It has come to mean someone, particularly a male, who has developed magical powers.When and how this happened I don't know.

A witch, on the other hand, originates in Olde English as well, and had both male and female forms, and implied a person who had magical power and this was its explicit meaning. It specifically meant someone with the power to bewitch others, usually of the opposite sex. The human equivalent of a demon of seduction, basically.

Male witches were called "wicca" and females "wicce", and the verb was "wiccian". If you pronounce the c's correctly, it sounds like a tch. So "witchah" and "witcheh". And if someone is "wiccian" you, they are "witchian" you, or "witchin" you. You are "bewitched".

In fact, witches were thought to be more conversant with spirits, and were thought even to have had congress, even sexual congress, with spirits. But perhaps it was more correct to have thought of them as Celtic shamans and shamanesses, and oracles later to have developed into institutionalized priesthoods, mostly Druidic.

So "witch" is far more magical in origin than "wizard", but wizardry has somehow come to be conflated with a notion of possession of magical power.

Magicians, being of a group called "Magians" and referred to as "Magi", were actually a sect of witch/wizards from the ancient Iranian plateau. The costumery often associated with "wizards" comes from that origin, and is reminiscent of a Scythian Magus, perhaps. They were scholars and mystagogues, and priests, not necessarily in that order.

Perhaps it was they, or rather Greek and later European interpretations of them as iconography for their own purposes which transformed "wizard" into something looking like a Persian Magus (or Mage, Magian, or Magician).

So in the end, for purposes of modern (not necessarily RPG/Fantasy Fiction) uses, we could say that witches represent a kind of innate magic with a propensity to charm or fascinate, wizards represent a profound intellect which is often the confluence of intelligence, intuition, experience, and discipline, whereas someone who managed to combine natural magical power with human mental adroitness would be some sort of psychospiritual renaissance being, a magician of sorts.

John Dee and Isaac Newton represent magicians in this sense, and are the modern representation of true Magi (in English terms). Zoroaster would have been a true Magus in his day, although the destruction of the libraries of Persepolis obscure what that would mean in detail, along with the rest of that tradition. Indeed, for all we know, much work was done there which is the forebear of modern science. Hard to be sure. But that's an aside.

Modern witches, in effect, would be female entertainers, and male entertainers, in any line of work or influences, using charm, often accentuated and augmented by psychotronics and other powerful technology. They're all over the place. Wizards are the deeper scientific and Machiavellian minds, working as either modern viziers, or ministers, giving tyrants advice, or in the former case, giving methods and technology to implement such advice. You have think tanks, councils, foundations, centers, and other "round table groups" just full of wizards and witches, acting as viziers for the ruling elite. Perhaps you have some evil magicians working in those folds as well, such as psychological operations officers high up in the intelligence communities, scientists studying dark technological and scientific frontiers in psychical and paranormal, and extradimensional topics.

You have good witches, good wizards, and good magi as well, but they are sprinkled around sparsely, outside the annals of worldly power, being kind to children and devoting themselves to their crafts, refusing to be corrupted.

  • In general, there's no clear dividing line between what a word "is" and what it has "come to mean"; this claim is often referred to as the "etymological fallacy." But for the purposes of world-building, your distinctions seem pretty good to me. The original poster might want to make up different distinctions, and that's also fine.
    – herisson
    Aug 9, 2015 at 22:08
  • 1
    Wizard is not from Old English as you would incorrectly portray it (and do please note spelling; “olde English” is wrong: the language of Beowulf is called Old English) but rather from Late Middle English, the very last period before the Early Modern English of Elizabethan England. You can tell because its wise component (seen also in wisdom) is nearly in its full modern form already. (Its -ard ending is a common albeit no longer productive combining form as seen in coward, drunkard, dastard, bastard, dullard, and many others.)
    – tchrist
    Aug 9, 2015 at 22:32
  • 1
    Yes, I should have capitalized olde. Aug 11, 2015 at 0:53
  • @AfshinNejat, thank you for the interesting answer.
    – Tragicomic
    Aug 12, 2015 at 18:41

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.