Possible Duplicates:
Are “should” and “if” interchangeable at the beginning of a sentence?
A special use of “should”?

For sentences that begin with "If", it seems that "should" can replace "If." For example:

If you ever...

Should you ever...

However after googling, it seems that "should" should not be used to replace "if." If this is true, then why do people do it?

I also looked up "should" in the dictionary, and I didn't find anything that says it means the same thing as "if."

marked as duplicate by JSBձոգչ, Cerberus, kiamlaluno, RegDwigнt May 23 '11 at 10:09

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.


'Should' is a formal version of 'if'.

From Cambridge Dictionaries Online:

formal, used when referring to a possible event in the future:

If anyone should ask for me, I'll be in the manager's office.

Should you (= If you) ever need anything, please don't hesitate to contact me.

  • Then is the "should" in "if you should ever" redundant? – language hacker May 22 '11 at 2:11
  • @language hacker: It depends on your definition of redundant. You could make the argument that should is a completely redundant word since it can also be replaced with "ought to" in other situations. But so what? – Kosmonaut May 22 '11 at 2:32
  • Good grief, no. Should is not a formal version of if, any more than may is the month before June. Both should and may are modal auxiliary verbs and do not occur alone, nor as conjunctions. – John Lawler Mar 10 '13 at 19:51

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.