Are these two sentences equivalent?
You needn't pay at once.
You don't need to pay at once.
If yes, which one would you recommend? Is it an US/GB thing?
They are equivalent in meaning; however, the non contracted forms would be
You need not pay at once.
You do not need to pay at once.
I think the first is more common in BrE (though I would request confirmation). The second formation is more common is AmE; however, we would more likely say
You don't need to pay right away.
I initially just thought needn't is probably more British usage, but that it's becoming increasingly archaic / affected.
So I produced this NGram to support my thinking. Restricting to just American or British doesn't suggest it's much more common in either.
Frankly, I just don't know what to make of this one showing the latest trend.
Nevertheless, I'd still advise OP to use don't need to. I doubt anyone would think that meant he wasn't keeping up with the times.
We can both use need not and don't need to. However, if needn't is followed by an object, we must use don't need.
For example : You don't need your coat. It's not cold outside.
"Coat" is an object, so it is wrong to say ,"You needn't your coat".
When the Americans want to express a lack of obligation, they use the helping verb (do) with negative (not) followed by need. Brits drop the helping verb and contract not
You needn't pay at once. Brits
You don't need to pay at once. Americans
They are not equivalent.
You needn't pay means that you paid and you're sorry you did.
You don't need to pay mean that you didn't pay and don't have to.
Thank you for your interest in this question.
Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).
Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?