English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It only takes a minute to sign up.
Sign up to join this community
The title pretty much already describes it:
Whats the 'neutral' term when relating to "success" or "failure"? A term which is neither, but still some kind of result?
To further elaborate, I'm looking for a 'logic' word, nothing that implies any kind of compromise or tie. To define something similar in javascript, it'ld be:
true - undefined - false
But I was wondering if there is a better word than undefined / unresolved, since those imply that there might be a resolution in the future.
Inconclusive (adj.) — Dictionary.com
not conclusive; not resolving fully all doubts or questions
"inconclusive evidence."without final results or outcome
"inconclusive experiments."
If someone were asked how she fared with a certain project, a response meaning "so-so" might be, "It was a middling success."
middling (adj.)
Of intermediate or average size, position, or quality; mediocre. The football team is never the worst or best in its league; its position is always middling.
To illustrate, here's an example from Norman Mailer's Advertisements for Myself:
[the book] sold over fifty thousand copies after returns which surprised a good many in publishing, as well as disappointing a few, including myself. I discovered that I had been poised for an enormous sale or a failure--a middling success was cruel to take.
Being a "both/and" kinda guy, I like, at times, to look at polar opposites (such as failure and success) as a combination of the two; a little of both, if you will. Instead of considering one step in the direction of success a failure, I like to consider it a partial success. After all, getting off the dime, so to speak, is perhaps the biggest step toward success. Inertia is overcome, and there is movement forward.
"Ah," but you say, "what of the runner--a marathoner, for example--who does not make it to the finish line? Clearly, he or she has not succeeded in what they started out to do?" Good question, but let me ask you, "Is only reaching the finish line a success, or is each mile the runner runs a partial success?"
More to the point, is not simply showing up at the starting line after months of training and building up stamina to the point where a 26-plus mile-run is within reach a kind of success? And what marathoner who wins a given marathon is not thinking about the next marathon in which he or she will beat their own best time, or beat the record on a regional scale (citywide, countywide, statewide, nationwide), or even beat the worldwide record!
What we humans accomplish in time and space will always be a mixture of past, present, and future. Our past informs our present and our present informs our future, and at no point can one say--accurately, at least--that a success is but a point-in-time accomplishment. After all, how can anyone pinpoint the present? As soon as you think you're in the present, you're instantly looking back on what was the present (thanks, George Carlin!).
Eugen Rosenstock-Huessy, Peter J. Leithart,1 and Charles Williams (a friend of C.S. Lewis) are on the right track, I believe, when they talk about the phenomenon they call, variously and respectively, reciprocal habitation, perichoresis (or reciprocal penetration), and coinherence. In the phenomena of time, space, society, marriage, family, community, religion, and so much more, the whole kit and caboodle may be ONE, but the PARTS cohere in some way and to some extent with the whole. Put differently, there is unity in diversity, diversity in unity, and diversity in autonomy.
Just at the very moment you begin to think of yourself as an autonomous critter--a virtual island, you also begin to realize (if you're honest with yourself and humble) how all the experiences, relationships, teachers, books, relatives (especially parents), failures, and successes have made you what you are today. We may be autonomous in the sense that each human being possesses an "irreducible otherness"2, but by the same token, each of us is indwelt mutually by each other, and that includes the past, the present, and the future. Can an individual ever be truly autonomous? (Well, perhaps only in death!)
Here are some suggestions:
headway toward success
progress away from failure and toward success
a modicum of success
gradations of success
segue to success
interim success
the interpenetration of the failures of the past and partial successes of the present
coinherence of failure and success
Take your pick.
Is there a single word for that middle ground? I cannot think of one offhand. That does not mean there isn't one, however! A little help, please!
1 Peter J. Leithart, Traces of the Trinity: Signs of God in Creation and Human Experience. Grand Rapids, MI: Brazos Press, 2015
2 Ibid., p.46
Perhaps "Resolution" or "Conclusion?" These state an end without implying a win or loss.
Gray.
The problem with answering this is the lack of context. But if I wanted to briefly and vaguely say the results were inconclusive without creating an expectation of later clarification, I would use gray.
How'd the mission go?
Gray. It was...gray.
barren: showing no results
'he scored yesterday to end his barren spell'
I'm not sure you can keep pace with our expectations. one word, the only word that might alter your indubitable incapability inhibits irreversibly inert inevitabilities, but the one word that's important is...IMPROVE
