1

This is just a simple question, but I was wondering about this. I would think "herd" is the subject here, and since a herd can't eat (only an individual cow can), would I need to rearrange this sentence to be accurate?

If this is a correct sentence, what if I changed it to "There was a herd of cattle all eating grass"? Does that make a difference?

4
  • No need. There was (a herd) of (cattle eating grass).
    – phoog
    Jul 11, 2015 at 4:09
  • Why do you think that "all eating grass" can modify cattle but "eating grass" can't?
    – deadrat
    Jul 11, 2015 at 4:10
  • 1
    The audience applauded. The crowd yelled. The fleet sailed. The flock flew. The chorus sang. If all (or at least the majority) of the group is doing it, the action can be attributed to the group.
    – Jim
    Jul 11, 2015 at 6:26
  • It's fine the way it is, though it would be more common to say "There was a herd of cattle grazing."
    – Hot Licks
    Jul 11, 2015 at 12:20

1 Answer 1

3

Consider what happens when the herd is sleeping. This doesn't mean that every cow is asleep, merely that sleep is the herd's current activity. Doing the same thing at the same time is the whole point of a herd. If a cow decides to travel while others are eating, it stops being a part of the herd--the herd is still eating.

1

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.