0

I often quote the documentation of the software I am writing about on StackOverflow. Typically, I use the short phrase:

Per documentation:

Also serving as deep link to the quoted passage, followed by the quote.

Recently somebody edited a post of mine to make this:

Per the documentation:

Not the most important detail, but now I wonder which is more correct. I like to be brief, so if either is correct my preference is obvious.

I am typically referring to the official documentation of the project, not just some documentation, if that should matter.

  • I think per documentation sounds better. – Misti Jul 8 '15 at 17:39
  • 1
    I always avoid "per" in this sense. It is too jargon-y for my taste. I would just use a label or header before a block quote ("The documentation:"), or I would write "according to" or the like. – phoog Jul 8 '15 at 19:26
  • Another approach is to simply post your content (block quote if it's an actual extraction from the documentation). Directly underneath, you can put "Source: <sourcename>" or make the sourcename a link. But if you prefer your style, you can use "from the documentation", which is a little more natural sounding. – fixer1234 Jun 4 '17 at 4:55
  • Why do you use "per" at all? What is it supposed to mean here? It strikes me as either redundant or wrong. – David Jun 4 '17 at 17:47
1

In my opinion, saying "Per the documentation" sounds more like a reference to THE documentation, that is OFFICIAL documentation. Saying, "Per documentation" carries just a hint of "some kind of documentation somewhere."

So I'd recommend "Per the documentation".

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.