4

What in God's name have we done?

It seems 'in God's name' = 'on earth'.

Improve this question
1
  • In that context it's a "minced oath". "In God's name" can of course be used in other contexts where it has a valid liturgical purpose.
    – Hot Licks
    Commented Sep 20, 2016 at 0:10

2 Answers 2

Reset to default
11

Without more context, it's probably figurative and used for emphasis. And yes, you could say that both "on earth" and "in God's name" can be used as intensifiers in this sentence, but I think "on earth" implies more incredulity while "in God's name" is more like regret.

on earth: What is the nature of this thing that we have done?

in God's name: Why did we do this (stupid, horrible, some other negative descriptor) thing?

It seems there is a slight difference, but I'm not sure if I've defined it well.

Improve this answer
2
  • 1
    Agreed - phrases like this seem to hew toward regret and horror: "What in the name of all that is good, decent, and holy, is in this sandwich?" would mean it doesn't taste good, whereas "on Earth" would imply the presence of an unknown ingredient and, possibly, that it's quite delicious.
    – The Raven
    Commented May 16, 2011 at 18:42
  • That is an excellent answer.
    – chasly - supports Monica
    Commented Oct 9, 2015 at 0:47
5

That is merely one kind of ejaculation:

a short sudden emotional utterance

It acts as an intensifier for the sentence.

You can see that

What the hell have we done?

and

What in God's name have we done?

are considerably more excited, if not stronger, than

What have we done?

Improve this answer

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .