1

Is an object (in this case, God's existence) necessary in this sentence?

We kept discussing.

We kept discussing whether God exists.

For example, with writing, it seems that an object isn't necessary for 'writing'.

I kept writing.

I kept writing my novel.

2
  • Hi User, I've made a dramatic edit to your question, I hope this captures what you're trying to ask. – dwjohnston Jun 25 '15 at 23:59
  • ...vs 'Keep discussing' vs. 'Discuss.' – Ronnie Royston Jul 26 '15 at 3:09
1

The answer is that all of your sentences are perfectly valid. Some verbs in English allow multiple valencies, which is to say the number of arguments controlled by the verb. In this case "writing" and "discussing" can both be either transitive, meaning they take an object, or intransitive, meaning they do not take an object.

Valency is a generalization of the concept of transitivity and English has several acceptable valencies. For example, the verb "to read" can take four different valencies:

Read! -- a command to read, avalent.

I read. -- With a subject, monovalent.

I read a book -- with a subject and object, divalent.

I read her a book. -- with one subject and two objects, trivalent.

In the case of "write" and "discuss", only the first three are allowable.

1
  • Hey Fraser - just note that it was me who put 'subject' in. I'll edit both the question and the answer to fix this. – dwjohnston Jun 26 '15 at 0:15

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.